IW STi Forum banner
21 - 40 of 72 Posts
Break down the practical benefits, please. I log with my laptop and the screen on my V2 is too small for any practical use (for me.) So, besides a bigger, better screen, and more memory, what's the benefit to forking over 325 bones for trade-in?

Better data logging capabilities? What does the added memory do for us?

This may be on the site, so please forgive my laziness if so; I'm on travel now and plan to look into this more when I return.


Same... If I'm doing any real work to my car, I've got the laptop and I'm in the passenger seat. The APv2 has been decent at taking some logs for minor things, making changes on the desktop when I get a chance, then flashing it onto the car, but for the most part, I'm just driving on a finished tune. In most cases, I do not want to be logging anyway. I just want to get in and drive the car, which I do.

I'll have to play with my buddies v3. In honesty, the v2 build was a cheap... VERY cheap piece (especially considering the price). Out of the box, my screen flickered and does not have a solid feel. Most of the guys I tune with the v2 have severe burn-in. I'm just not in a hurry to give Cobb any more of my money after having it.

If it weren't for real time tuning and the ability to store maps on a small device, I would still be using my TacTrix since any real logging is done with a laptop. Someone needs to make an app for my phone. I always have it on me, it costs far less, and does a hell of a lot more.
 
To Cobb: any way you guys can do a 100 octane stage 2 race gas map??? Or how about an E85 Map?? I would think the race gas map would be very popular especially if it was an option for stage 1 and stage 2 maps that have already been well established as far as what components are needed for them...adding a more aggressive tune for these stages to take advantage of 100 octane fuel would be nice.
 
To Cobb: any way you guys can do a 100 octane stage 2 race gas map??? Or how about an E85 Map?? I would think the race gas map would be very popular especially if it was an option for stage 1 and stage 2 maps that have already been well established as far as what components are needed for them...adding a more aggressive tune for these stages to take advantage of 100 octane fuel would be nice.
We've had race gas maps in the past and it turns out they were not very popular. E85 maps are something that we would be more likely to look into down the road, although this would require aftermarket injectors.

Bill
 
Same... If I'm doing any real work to my car, I've got the laptop and I'm in the passenger seat. The APv2 has been decent at taking some logs for minor things, making changes on the desktop when I get a chance, then flashing it onto the car, but for the most part, I'm just driving on a finished tune. In most cases, I do not want to be logging anyway. I just want to get in and drive the car, which I do.

I'll have to play with my buddies v3. In honesty, the v2 build was a cheap... VERY cheap piece (especially considering the price). Out of the box, my screen flickered and does not have a solid feel. Most of the guys I tune with the v2 have severe burn-in. I'm just not in a hurry to give Cobb any more of my money after having it.

If it weren't for real time tuning and the ability to store maps on a small device, I would still be using my TacTrix since any real logging is done with a laptop. Someone needs to make an app for my phone. I always have it on me, it costs far less, and does a hell of a lot more.
This is in my opinion really the obvious better solution that I and many others have thought of. I was recently talking to Tactrix about developing an Android app. This would not only allow you to use your phone, but also a tablet or even an android head unit. Imagine how much better having a touch screen head unit with maps on an SD card for tuning would be than a tacky AP attached to the dash. You'd also have the freedom to use and store your maps as you saw fit. You would no longer be stuck with an over priced proprietary device with no removable memory.

Anyone who has ever compared a decent pro-tune to a Cobb OTS map knows that OTS maps are far from ideal. For Cobb's bottom line they are great... they get to sell the same maps thousands of times, but the consumer is really getting a raw deal in my opinion. You end up paying $650 for a device that probably cost about $20 to make because you get these OTS maps that are jumpy and make about half the power that a decent protune would. You also end up being able to use a very limited number of hard parts and having to protune if you want things like the highest quality intake etc.

As for 6x live data this is just a gimmick in my opinion. The 5 most popular gauges are Boost, Oil P, Oil T, EGT and Wideband... the AP is limited to factory metrics so it does exactly 1 of these 5 things. After the novelty wears off this AP will end up in the glove box for most customers just like the last one did. Does it have more memory than the last one, is it faster? Yeah but the V2 AP set the bar pretty low. The V3 isn't anywhere near what an android device that costs half as much can do when it comes to processing speed, memory, screen resolution or any other technical specification you can measure.

I recommended these things for a long time because at the time I really felt like they were the best option (I've probably sold more of these on IW than anyone else), but on my latest STi I realized that off the shelf maps on new STis are pretty terrible in my opinion. On my older cars they were much better, but on these newer cars the power isn't linear at all it felt like driving my 07 with the OEM tune. Sure they are better than stock, but not much better. Certainly not $650 better. The problem you have when a company has a virtual monopoly on something like this is it becomes very difficult for vendors like us to offer a better solution and make any money doing it. Even a low level Cobb dealer pays $520 for a V3 AP with free shipping from what I'm told. Even though a Tactrix interface and a real human doing some actual tuning is a cheaper better option (more power, safer power, better logging etc) it's very difficult for vendors to make any money selling this kind of thing, but anyone who knows us knows that money has never been our main focus.

I've thought long and hard about it and had a few long conversations with a tuner friend of mine. After driving my 13 with a few different Cobb OTS maps I just can't see myself promoting this stuff anymore. I've closed all of our AP threads and I'm doing my best to clear out our remaining inventory at a fair price. I'd rather offer a good product than a highly profitable one. The biggest problem we have is the fact that a Tactrix interface relies solely on a laptop. If anyone who is good with android wants to work with us on this for the good of the Subaru community PM me I'd love to chat about it.

In the end I'm really not sure if there is money to be made on any of this, but I want it to happen because I want there to be a better solution than APs for myself and everyone else who owns a late model turbo Subaru. The technology for something infinitely better than an AccessPORT is right there in front of us we just have to make it happen. If there is any car enthusiast community with people who are intelligent enough and have the technical ability to do this sort of thing it's the Subaru community.

-Geoff
 
The cobb unit wins for convenience. If we could use android to talk to the J2354 interface (Already been done via different hardware), we could have an OS form of an AP. I've peeked into the interface documentation, and it wouldnt be that hard. Problem is that I hate java, and therefore am not the developer needed to make an android app. I could support said developer, perform unit testing / regression testing, but we still need a mobile device developer to do the heavy lifting.
 
If we could use android to talk to the J2354 interface (Already been done via different hardware), we could have an OS form of an AP. I've peeked into the interface documentation, and it wouldnt be that hard. Problem is that I hate java, and therefore am not the developer needed to make an android app. I could support said developer, perform unit testing / regression testing, but we still need a mobile device developer to do the heavy lifting.
There is someone on IWSTI who can do this I'm sure of it. We just need to find him. I will sell him parts under cost for life for his efforts of making this great idea a reality :)

If there are any ideas of how to make it profitable that is another area where I'd be open to suggestions, but if it's just completely open source and free for everyone that would be ideal. There just needs to be some sort of motivation for someone to put the time into developing this and under cost parts is the best I've really got.

-Geoff
 
A few years ago when Cobb was asking customer advice on the next AP, I was telling them to go to a smart phone setup. My APv2 does just as you said, it sits in the glove box or not in the car at all. Did I ever mention that it's a cheap POS for the money?

With that said, I'd like to see this happen as well... And not from Cobb. I haven't been a fan of Cobb since the BS they pulled with the v3 release (only to find out from a friend that they did the same when the v2 was released).
 
at first glance... the smart phone app seems like an excellent idea and why would anyone want some type of stand alone unit when we could just use our smart phone....???

after thinking about it more.....
I have my v3 mounted when i drive, all the time... and thats how i like it.
I dont want to have to grab it when my boss calls me, or start clicking around on it when pandora is not playing what i want, or when im trying to send a text, or email.... or.. or.. etc.

Next thing you know, i would be at the house and my "cobb" smartphone, just turned into me screwing around with other stuff and it being useless as an access port.

Cobb.... for me, the stand alone is good.
 
:eek:I will be having my motor rebuilt by a Cobb Authorized Vendor in January, and I suppose because of this I MUST have an AP for him to tune the new enigine? If that is true I suppose it comes down to $400+ for a used V2 or the extra half weeks pay for V3. Advice for me?
 
21 - 40 of 72 Posts