IW STi Forum banner
21 - 40 of 152 Posts
Quoting the answer to my question because I might be retarded: I can't find any info on what quick connectors I'll need (on the engine side, not the FPR side) in order to install a longer length of fuel line.

Anyone?
Yes, it is definitely a resonance issue. Did you just throw a 3' coil of fuel line under your hood? How did you plumb it, those fuel line fittings (from lines to rails) are not something I can source easily.
Can someone who has tried this out let us know what they did about connecting the hose on the fuel rail side, where the factory quick-connect is?
 
After installing the second inline damper, i noticed that there is a very slight hesitation that is absent when i used the 1 meter hose. Second damper might not be enough to fully cancel out the reasonant wave. Reinstalled the 1 meter hose and all is well again


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So just wondering guys the Line that goes to the Hardline from the Damper is there no Clamp ?? Just a Quick connector ?
 
Dude. Seriously? After we just went through all this an hour ago, in my thread, with pics of both a quick connector setup and a clamp setup? Really?
Mate your not understanding the question and you not answered my question in the other thread. And your pic just shows your modification doesn't show stock set up.

So asking once again does your stock handline set up just have a quick connector ?? It does it have a clamp ??
 
I think the confusion here is North America spec vs AUS Spec.

Ours (in the US) has quick connectors crimped on to the stock hoses where they connect to the metal tube assembly, so that is what we have to use when replacing the hose.

It appears that on yours (In Australia) the fuel line simply clamps to the metal tube assembly.
 
I think the confusion here is North America spec vs AUS Spec.

Ours (in the US) has quick connectors crimped on to the stock hoses where they connect to the metal tube assembly, so that is what we have to use when replacing the hose.

It appears that on yours (In Australia) the fuel line simply clamps to the metal tube assembly.
Ahh I see... Interesting why they would change that. But yes we have a fuel line that connects to a metal tube with a simple screw clamp around it.
So all we did was unscrew the clamp pull the fuel line off and replace it with 3ft of it.

But what also confuses me is that the pic on Romraider that shows a diagram of a USA car detailing this same mod setup also has the clamp to the handline and NO Quick connector
 
There is no reason one is forced to buy the quick connector. You can just slide the new fuel line over the flare on the hardline that the quick connector used. I think that is what was done on the RomRaider pic.
 
There is no reason one is forced to buy the quick connector. You can just slide the new fuel line over the flare on the hardline that the quick connector used. I think that is what was done on the RomRaider pic.
I'm pretty sure the RomRaider pic was from an overseas car...

It probably will work on a US car as well, but the quick connect was $12. I'd rather spend the $12 and have an OEM style connection than just jam the hose on and hope it holds.
 
I think the confusion here is North America spec vs AUS Spec.

Ours (in the US) has quick connectors crimped on to the stock hoses where they connect to the metal tube assembly, so that is what we have to use when replacing the hose.

It appears that on yours (In Australia) the fuel line simply clamps to the metal tube assembly.
Which is exactly what I explained to him in the other thread (with pictures.) *shrug*
 
I read that you need to set the engine load table to zero after this mod, but would doing this mod without changing the tune be harmful?
My tuner said it doesn't affect your tune once you zero out the load compensation tables. Plug in play mod. And very affective straight away. It's amazing how much smoother it is than a pro tune
 
My tuner said it doesn't affect your tune once you zero out the load compensation tables. Plug in play mod. And very affective straight away. It's amazing how much smoother it is than a pro tune
The load compensation tables only seem to be there for this issue. The resonance sets up around 2700 rpm and continues up to a little past 3000 rpm, that is where all the changes are in those tables. Even with a lot of logging and fine manipulation there are still times when I can feel the engine not being perfectly smooth. I already made a map with the load tables zeroed, going to try this out tonight.
 
Haha wow! After a good 6 months of trying to figure this out ><

Haven't zeroed out my tables yet but just went back to stock GR FPR and added the extra hose.
All I have to say is it works =D

AFR's at 1400 are still a bit high but the resonance at 2800 is completely gone. Can't wait to zero out those tables =D
 
My setup has the 05 STI dampers, a Perrin Parallel fuel rail system, and aftermarket FPR. I zeroed the load compensation, then started data logging.

It still requires some values to the load comp tables. The values go up to about +3 to +5 on my setup. The OEM +12 values are gone.

I think load comp is there for both fuel line & intake tract resonance.
 
Haha wow! After a good 6 months of trying to figure this out ><
Six months?! Try four years! The RomRaider development was a huge step forward and at least made me not want to get rid of the car, but the mechanical fix is sooo much better. Did it last night and zeroed out the load tables. The next question is how much longer the hose needs to be - right now I have a double coil, if I could cut off enough length to make it a single loop I would be happier. Less things to rub against each other, etc. Anyone try adding just two feet of hose?
 
21 - 40 of 152 Posts