Joined
·
2,472 Posts
i loved physics, but i took the calculus-based series nearly 100 years ago. the subject says it all. it seems tranny losses (which i assume are frictional) should be a constant (the tranny's coefficient of friction) rather than a function of the applied force (which is what we're saying when we talk about losses as percents).
in a stock setup, i can see that we would say tranny losses are x%; say 25%. for example, a stock wrx with 227bhp produces 170whp; 57hp tranny loss.
but if we then add mods and get 250whp, it *seems* that people will reverse the logic and say it's making 333bhp (333bph - 25% = 250whp).
if my supposition is correct (that tranny losses are constant), then these mods would actually result in "only" 307bph (250whp + 57hp tranny loss = 307hp).
put another way. if we add did mod that added 100bhp (note the "b"), i would expect all 100 extra bhp to make it to the wheels.
i'm missing something fundamental. enlighten me.
in a stock setup, i can see that we would say tranny losses are x%; say 25%. for example, a stock wrx with 227bhp produces 170whp; 57hp tranny loss.
but if we then add mods and get 250whp, it *seems* that people will reverse the logic and say it's making 333bhp (333bph - 25% = 250whp).
if my supposition is correct (that tranny losses are constant), then these mods would actually result in "only" 307bph (250whp + 57hp tranny loss = 307hp).
put another way. if we add did mod that added 100bhp (note the "b"), i would expect all 100 extra bhp to make it to the wheels.
i'm missing something fundamental. enlighten me.