[amdmaxx]

http://wardsauto.com/ar/auto_subarus_second_car/index.htm

 

[darwood]

Nice find. This is probably the first article I've read that complimented the STi over the EVO for a handling aspect.

But the STi doesn't torque steer as badly as its key competitor, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo.

 

[CloNeGTS]

Sorry....I read the first paragraph and I already discredit these guys.

"First use of variable timing on boxer engine" Welcome to the world economy my friend.

"Besides the Cessna-grade wing.....nearly indistinguishable from the WRX" Oh yeah, except for the badges, wheels, brakes, scoop, fog covers....yeah, close.

 

[CloNeGTS]

Oh....and they spelled it Subaru Technica International.......they can't even copy from a press release right.

 

[darwood]

no hid headlights on 2004 sti cdn version

So he got his facts mixed up. We can't all be Subaru geeks.

 

[CloNeGTS]

I don't expect people to know everything.....just don't act like you do when you don't!

 

[amdmaxx]

someone is angry today..

 

[wojo]

I would agree with CloneGTS. Are they joking?! That's just ridiculous

 

[darwood]

someone is angry today..

hehe

 

[Guest]

I thought it was a good review.

 

[SnowbordrWRX]

It is a good review. Just very sloppy grammatically. I saw the 2nd paragraph and said aloud, "you already said that!" That's gotta be the dumbest mistake of any article, repeating a paragraph right back-to-back.

I disagree with the point that the STi is a stripped-down Impreza on the inside. Rigggghht. DCCD is there. So is a turbo-charged 2.5 L boxer engine. It's still a Subaru? cmon! When did you hear a $30,000 BMW or Audi win the WRC? Never, cuz such cars don't exist! Not at that price...