thanks for sharing! so what are your two cars going to be to replace the STi?
My logs were clean for the first 40 days after the turbo swap, then from about day 41 to 59 the car started to idle quite rough ( at cold start rev up to 2600 then back down, for about 2 minutes on/ off until it settle down to idle). Once the car threw a code my logs represented an actual real misfire and Cobb confirmed it to be bad. Compression and leakdown confirmed #4 was done and #2 not so great either. My ringlands on #4 were destroyed. I had the car shipped off immediately after this occurred since the code would not clear for a 25 minute drive. Once the engine was built I had great logs, zero knock, and never threw a code.E85 is definitely good for power but at the cost of eating through certain fuel pumps and also high cylinder pressures which compounds the stress of a big turbo on a stock motor. How did your datalogs look with the big turbo before you blew the stock motor?
I got an Audi S4 white with black optics package 6sp. manual for the DD and a low mileage '99 Mazda Miata with roll bar, seat etc. Track prepped. It's a blast on the track. Hilarious to drive Miata on the street because it feels like molasses, because it is! 9.5 inch wide tires on a Miata looks aggressive since it's almost the full width of the car! I think my wife likes the Miata a lot more than our mini van so it went from track car to grocery getter pretty quickly . Not sure how that happened!thanks for sharing! so what are your two cars going to be to replace the STi?
No doubt. I wish I had kept it stage 1 with sway bars and the nice wheels and called it a day.These cars simply aren't built for serious tracking. The engine isn't stout enough and it takes money just to get these cars to handle as well as say a stock EVO. These cars shine in the role of daily drivers and occasional track use and there's no shame in that.
Great post and thank you for sharing. ...These cars rock at stage one. I am also a mid age STi owner currently at Stage 1 all stock. Purchased my WRB STi Limited from a doctor in Richmond Virginia last April of 2013 and have considered going stage 2 but after reading your post and weighing the pros and cons I will call it a day and just enjoy it as a dd stage 1.No doubt. I wish I had kept it stage 1 with sway bars and the nice wheels and called it a day.
It would have been a perfect DD. I just went too nuts! Like I said though No Regrets for the smiles!!
Almost non of the cars from factory (like 99.5% including EVO) are built for serious tracking except Z06, GT3 and etc. but they have their share of faults too.These cars simply aren't built for serious tracking.
Well yes but there are a cars with stouter engines that handle better stock. EVO doesn't make as good of a DD because the suspension is firmer but the advantage of that shows up on the track and the 4B11 at least has 4-bolt main and Mahle forged pistons. Of course some other parts may break but out of the box it's a better car for the track.Almost non of the cars from factory (like 99.5% including EVO) are built for serious tracking except Z06, GT3 and etc. but they have their share of faults too.
Almost non of the cars from factory (like 99.5% including EVO) are built for serious tracking except Z06, GT3 and etc. but they have their share of faults too.
I see fast STI track drivers going with _stock_ engine powers and they are fast, scary fast.
Most people don't realize that once they go beyond factory engine specs they need to properly re-design the whole engine bay to make their STIs track safe. I think most of modded STI are not good for track use. That's one of the reasons I don't want to go with bigger turbo.
If I'd get a new STI I probably will just do a safe _protuned_ Stage1 with stock(ish) boost levels (15-16psi) and invest the rest into suspension for DD/occasional track use (i.e. once a month).
I recently had to go through a partial rebuild of my built motor (there was no mechanical failure!) because E85 left a huge amount of deposits in both heads... I was running E85 100% of time (street and track/AutoX). Not doing that anymore.
Glad I could share! Power-wise stage 2 gets you less gain than Stage 1 did. Stage 1 was awesome, i'll never forget after I flashed to stage 1, that feeling was night and day. It was like the car wanted to lift off the ground! These are awesome cars. I'd keep your ability to flash back to stock (even though the counter will show the ECU has been altered- about zero to none you will have any issues with dealership). You'll own your car potentially a lot longer than i did!Great post and thank you for sharing. ...These cars rock at stage one. I am also a mid age STi owner currently at Stage 1 all stock. Purchased my WRB STi Limited from a doctor in Richmond Virginia last April of 2013 and have considered going stage 2 but after reading your post and weighing the pros and cons I will call it a day and just enjoy it as a dd stage 1.
Considering going stage 2, but I dont want to lose the stock reliability. Even if I added new fuel system dp,headers,intake, and all that, then I would worry about the internals! And im not crazy about running an AP at this time because im not quite sure how to use it.
I compete in the stock class for time attack and I agree with this. It's funny, but many times stock class STI's run a faster lap time than modded ones. My hypothesis is that stock class drivers focus more on technique to go fast while modded drivers rely more on mods. That's just a general observation and not the universal truth. In any case, my STI has proven to be reliable with lots of tracking i can't complain.I see fast STI track drivers going with _stock_ engine powers and they are fast, scary fast.
I did Koyo Radiator, eL headers coated and wrapped, larger TMIC fully heat taped ( didn't want to lose front crash bar installing FMIC), wrapped DP, isolated my Cold Air Intake to near ambient temps, turbo blanket, e85 and low boost mapHow might have you dealt with cooling issues on the track?
Thanks. Yep, more focusing on the driving is more fun anyway. Especially when the car still runs! Ha!I compete in the stock class for time attack and I agree with this. It's funny, but many times stock class STI's run a faster lap time than modded ones. My hypothesis is that stock class drivers focus more on technique to go fast while modded drivers rely more on mods. That's just a general observation and not the universal truth. In any case, my STI has proven to be reliable with lots of tracking i can't complain.
OP: thanks for sharing I enjoyed your post.
sent from my Galaxy S3
Thank you for sharing, threelete!Agree 110% with your post
I just had my first Autocross a week ago since the car went through a partial rebuilt this summer. I was running 91oct first time since my motor got built last year (was running 100% of time on E85). It could be all mental but I think that my car was more balanced to my suspension setup running 91oct. It was a bit easier to drive at the limit. E85 produced to much low-mid torque for my suspension/tires.I compete in the stock class for time attack and I agree with this. It's funny, but many times stock class STI's run a faster lap time than modded ones. My hypothesis is that stock class drivers focus more on technique to go fast while modded drivers rely more on mods. That's just a general observation and not the universal truth. In any case, my STI has proven to be reliable with lots of tracking i can't complain.
OP: thanks for sharing I enjoyed your post.
sent from my Galaxy S3