... If you would actually take a neon over the STI then you dont appreciate it enough to get it. As for the Rx-8 .... This outta be some insight for whats in store for you (possibly): http://supraforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=137611&highlight=rx8airwynn said:Hi everyone..I'm debating whether or not to buy an STI...I'm not sure if I should get that..., the Mazda RX-8, or the NEON 2004 SRT-4..please give me your insigts..please...Also, does anyone have any images for body kits for the 2004 STI??
I thought the lack of torque was enough cause for doom and gloom on the RX-8. Its got a decent top end (~260 hp) but torque is severly lacking (~161 ft-lbs). I was considering one of these, but they're just not worth it when you can get much more for a slight increase in cash.staticx313 said:They mention random CEL lights and no one knows why... recalls on oil pans... you'll see when you read. Im not trying to be doom and gloom about the RX8 but, thats some serious stuff.
mistkerl said:I went and checked out an RX-8, they had it stickered to 33 grand! I was like.. uhh guys...
The salesmen were too busy checking out my STi to be of much help. One guy kept going on and on about how much better the STi brakes were than the RX-8's. I think he just had a gold brembo fetish,