IW STi Forum banner

101 - 120 of 134 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
109 Posts
That doesn't apply to just VW, this is pretty much any car manufacturer nowadays. It also largely depends on the dealer. When I had my STi the service advisor told me that a catback could definitely void the warranty in a result of engine failure, anything more than an axleback was not acceptable in Subaru's eyes.

With VW, you can always go APR Plus if you want to tune and have some kind of warranty. Subaru would void your warranty just as well if you plan on tuning. Have there been cases where SoA covered engine failure with a tune as a good-will? Yes, but there have also been cases like that with a VW.

Also, you can get a JB4 piggyback mod to increase boost and modify A/F. It's fairly easy to remove and does not get flagged as a tune. A friend of mine was able to improve his 1/4 mile time by nearly a full second with just a $400 JB4 mod.
[/url]
A couple of incorrect statements here.

First, Subaru doesn't blanket void warranties, they will refuse to cover things when caused by mods, which is completely understandable. Sometimes it's a fight to prove it, but you have a chance. Blew your engine because of a big turbo? They aren't going to cover it - but if your radiator starts leaking while under warranty, big turbo or not, they're going to take care of you.

VAG is blanket voiding warranties over this stuff. Take your car in for a flat tire, they're going to void your warranty when they scan for a tune. Have a problem with a wastegate rattle? Too bad. Leaky radiator? Too bad. That's the difference. There are absolutely no goodwill requests being honored like this at VAG any longer, unless it's something minor that the dealer can fly under the radar with. Any and all major engine, trans, or diff warranty claims require an ECU dump to be sent to VAG corporate for review before they will approve the claim. Any evidence of a tune (or other modified equipment they can detect) results in a 100% void of the factory powertrain warranty from corporate. This is happening left and right to folks on the S3 and RS3 forums, and it's hitting especially hard for the folks who tried a tune and returned it after a couple hundred miles, as well as people who bought used cars that had previously been tuned.

Additionally, on top of physically inspecting under the hood - again, this when your car is in for ANY type of service - they can now detect traces of piggybacks like the JB4. It may only be 50% of the time - but that's a heck of a risk of liability on a car with a $15k+ engine.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
294 Posts
I'm going based on factual sources. We're going by MSRP numbers and listed prices of dealerships, not what you claim you paid.https://www.northparksubaru.net/new/Subaru/2019-Subaru-WRX-san-antonio-tx-61adc04c0a0e0a1746b9647da4ab7087.htm
Why would I lie about what I paid? would you like to see my bill of sale? or the many quotes that I received for $3-4k under MSRP from different dealerships? Sure, going by MSRP is easier.. but it's not an accurate picture of what people are paying and the amount of depreciation that they're facing when trading in or reselling their STI.

It's factual that in a lot of areas you can easily get a '19 STI for well under MSRP without any real negotiation.. I simply asked for an online quote. Go checkout the "2019 STI Orders" thread on NASIOC and you'll see that $3-4k under MSRP is common. I feel bad if you paid MSRP for a '19 STI.

The point that I was trying to make is that the trade-in value (especially for 2018 STIs) is going to be lower when:
  1. The 2019s are more desirable with their powertrain improvements, Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, etc.
  2. People are getting great deals on the '19s and paying under invoice. This will have a huge impact on the trade-in/resale values.
The Golf R is a great car.. but it's much easier to get a STI under MSRP. Show me anyone that has gotten a comparable deal on a new Golf R.

Below is my original quote before I negotiated an additional $500 off.




Why are we even talking about a Golf R in the "2020 STI Changes" thread?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
109 Posts
The Golf R is a great car.. but it's much easier to get a STI under MSRP. Show me anyone that has gotten a comparable deal on a new Golf R.


Why are we even talking about a Golf R in the "2020 STI Changes" thread?
Definitely a great point. Even though there really aren't many STIs sold in a year, VW has a tendency to release all of the Golf Rs in a huge batch - so they're extremely available for a very short time, and then you can't get one at all for ~9 months... breeding excitement for when the next model year finally arrives.

Agreed, though - this thread went WAY off topic, and it's really my fault.

As of now, I've heard nothing new on the 2020, but we should hear something - if anything is coming - in the next couple of weeks.

There's been a lot of speculation that the S209 is the reason for the late model year release. They shut down ordering really late for the 2019 STI... Then they have ~200 S209s to build and ship to Subaru Tecnica International before they can get started on the mainline 2020 builds. All speculation, of course, but I'd be willing to bet that it's something similar.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
500 Posts
In 2016 I got 3-3.5 off MSRP. I dont think many dealers have been selling stis for MSRP since 2010 or at least the gen 1s were out. Subarus hold their values I had a subaru forester xt and they ae no longer made, the demand for them is huge. I would say any turbo subaru will hold their value better than any thing else in its segment and on the road. Used subarus bring excellent money just the way it is and by huge depreciation you might be talking 2-3 grand below what they wojdl sell for new. I would not worry about that and just drive the car.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
49 Posts
Give us S209 powertrain in an STI premium for under 10k extra. That would make it under $65000 CAD after tax. Simlar to Focus RS price and what it offered for performance. RIP.

Easily doable, parts are already in subaru's bin. Maybe 2021. Hybrid STI seems far away, very unlikely in next few years.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
116 Posts
In 2016 I got 3-3.5 off MSRP. I dont think many dealers have been selling stis for MSRP since 2010 or at least the gen 1s were out. Subarus hold their values I had a subaru forester xt and they ae no longer made, the demand for them is huge. I would say any turbo subaru will hold their value better than any thing else in its segment and on the road. Used subarus bring excellent money just the way it is and by huge depreciation you might be talking 2-3 grand below what they wojdl sell for new. I would not worry about that and just drive the car.
I got my 18 base in October of 17, it was the first 18 they had and only for 2 weeks. I didn't even ask and got it under invoice.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
49 Posts
Does anyone know more on this? I know torque news has had some solid leads in the past. I'd hope it wasn't true. Sending off the last year STI with 310hp and non S209 internals sucks. Canada got ripped the most not getting a chance to even get an S209.

Sad state of Subaru. They have potential customers willing to spend more to be competitive to RS3/TTRS/CLA45/M2. Those cars are all in the 400hp range and can be 500whp with light bolt on/tune.

2020 Subaru WRX STI, Next Generation 2021 STI Details Leaked - YouTube
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
955 Posts
all of those cars you listed MSRP for well above what an STi does. at least in the US

RS3 MSRP $56,200
TTRS MSRP $66,900
CLA45 $53,100
BMW M2 $58,900

none of them, besides the CLA45 AMG, use a 4 cylinder engine. and the AMG engine is hand crafted
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
294 Posts
Sad state of Subaru. They have potential customers willing to spend more to be competitive to RS3/TTRS/CLA45/M2. Those cars are all in the 400hp range and can be 500whp with light bolt on/tune.

2020 Subaru WRX STI, Next Generation 2021 STI Details Leaked - YouTube
It'll be interesting to see what Subaru does with the pricing of the S209. I've heard rumors that the MSRP will be around $65k. As you mentioned, that puts its 341 hp engine up against a lot of faster cars (M2, GT350, new 416 hp AMG 45s, RS3, etc.). Not to mention, the new game changer C8 Corvette.. At least it's a limited production model and is the only car out of the group that comes with AWD, 4 doors & a manual transmission. It'll certainly struggle to be competitive in that price range. The next gen STI really has its work cut out for it.

Hopefully the next gen will have the FA24 with stronger internals, a larger twin scroll ball bearing turbo, and dual injection (like the BRZ - for power in higher rpms & reducing carbon buildup). It'll need at least 350-400 hp to stay relevant. The FA20s respond really well to flex fuel and can easily reach 350-400whp with bolt ons, but that starts pushing the limit of their rods. Hopefully the next gen STI will be able to push ~450whp with e85, full bolt ons & a tune.. but only time will tell. Subaru has really kept their plans a secret.. hopefully that doesn't mean the next gen is even further away.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Subaru is always super secretive though and drops new gen cars out of nowhere especially with the STI but weird not to see any on nurburgring yet

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
201 Posts
It'll be interesting to see what Subaru does with the pricing of the S209. I've heard rumors that the MSRP will be around $65k. As you mentioned, that puts its 341 hp engine up against a lot of faster cars (M2, GT350, new 416 hp AMG 45s, RS3, etc.). Not to mention, the new game changer C8 Corvette.. At least it's a limited production model and is the only car out of the group that comes with AWD, 4 doors & a manual transmission. It'll certainly struggle to be competitive in that price range. The next gen STI really has its work cut out for it.
The thing with the S209 is it's exclusivity. I see all those cars you mentioned an nearly a daily basis. Everyone is flipping out over the new Vette, but just wait and see, they will be as common as a Mustang before too long @ 60 grand.

You can still have a shit ton of fun with 341 HP.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
5,243 Posts
I'll never understand why anyone who is actually concerned about exclusivity would ever have their eyes on any car in STINKs [ :)] list let alone a Subaru.

Yeah, I know your not the only one to use that term here. Seen it for RA.s and gray something or others and whatever . . . :rolleyes:

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
294 Posts
The thing with the S209 is it's exclusivity. I see all those cars you mentioned an nearly a daily basis. Everyone is flipping out over the new Vette, but just wait and see, they will be as common as a Mustang before too long @ 60 grand.

You can still have a shit ton of fun with 341 HP.
You must live in a really nice area to see those on a daily basis :)

I understand the exclusivity and that people will pay that much for a limited edition.. but it's not that much different than a regular STI (or even a WRX for non-car people). I'm sure the S209s will sell out immediately, but I personally can't justify spending $60k+ for a Subaru.. unless it was like the 22B where it was as fast as most supercars during its era.

I'm not a Chevrolet/Corvette fan, but I'm still impressed that they've built a budget, mid-engine car that will compete with exotics for < $60k.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
500 Posts
all of those cars you listed MSRP for well above what an STi does. at least in the US

RS3 MSRP $56,200
TTRS MSRP $66,900
CLA45 $53,100
BMW M2 $58,900

none of them, besides the CLA45 AMG, use a 4 cylinder engine. and the AMG engine is hand crafted
And to add none of them with the exception of the BMW come in manual transmission
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
49 Posts
He skipped over reading this lol

They have potential customers willing to spend more to be competitive to RS3/TTRS/CLA45/M2. Those cars are all in the 400hp range and can be 500whp with light bolt on/tune.
Everyone knows STI competiion Golf R, Ford SHO, V6 CaMrY/MiNi VaNs.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
294 Posts
all of those cars you listed MSRP for well above what an STi does. at least in the US

RS3 MSRP $56,200
TTRS MSRP $66,900
CLA45 $53,100
BMW M2 $58,900

none of them, besides the CLA45 AMG, use a 4 cylinder engine. and the AMG engine is hand crafted
That's true, the STI is cheaper than the other cars mentioned. It's avoided price inflation and has held its base price pretty well compared to other vehicles. Granted they've been using the same general powertrain for 15 years so that probably helps cut their costs. But in 2004, the STI would have been competitive against the equivalent models of those cars.

2004 STI
MSRP ~$32k
300 HP @ 6000 rpm (@ 14.5 psi)
300 LB-FT @ 4000 rpm
0-60 mph: 4.6 sec
5-60 mph: 5.8 sec
1/4 mile: 13.2 sec
Skidpad: 0.90 G
Braking: 60-0 111 ft (70-0 166 ft)
Curb weight: 3260 lbs
LB/HP: 10.87

2019 STI
MSRP ~$37k
310 HP @ 6000 rpm (@ 16.2 psi)
290 LB-FT @ 4000-5200 rpm
0-60 mph: 5.4-5.7 sec
5-60 mpg: 6.9 sec
1/4 mile: 13.9 sec
Skidpad: 0.93 G
Braking: 60-0 109 ft (70-0 158 ft)
Curb weight: 3446 lbs
LB/HP: 11.12

As you can see, the new STI is worse in almost every way on the spec sheet. The appeal of the STI in the '00s was that it competed with much more expensive cars with bigger engines. Its performance hasn't changed much over the last 15 years while other cars have gotten much faster. Sure, the safety, interior, ride quality, and handling have improved, but it actually accelerates slower due to the added weight (almost 200 lbs).

The 2004 STI had performance numbers that were quite impressive for its time. For reference:
  • A 2004 Mustang GT had 260 HP/302 LB-FT, 0-60 in ~6 sec, and 1/4 mile in high 14s. The 2019 Mustang GT has 460 HP/420 LB-FT, 0-60 in 3.9 sec, and 1/4 mile in high 11s. The '04 STI was closer in performance to the more powerful & expensive Mustang Cobra "Terminator" (supercharged v8) in terms of 0-60 & 1/4 mile times. Now the STI is more on par with the cheaper Mustang EcoBoost (turbo 4)..
  • The '04 STI was very similar in performance to the M3 of the time. Now the BMW M2 Comp does 0-60 in 4.0 sec and 1/4 mile in 12.4 sec.
I think some would pay more for a STI that was more competitive performance-wise. I think a large part of the problem is that Subaru doesn't feel a need to spend the money and make any real performance improvements. People are still buying the STI, it accounts for a very low portion of their sales, and it has no direct competition with the Evo & Focus RS out of the picture. The CTR is better in almost every way, but it's FWD and over-styled (IMO). And loyal Subaru enthusiasts are willing to pay $50k+ for limited editions that are marginally faster. Don't get me wrong, I think it's great that Subaru is finally offering the S209 in the US, but I wouldn't pay $60k+ for it.

Disclaimer:
A performance spec sheet doesn't tell the whole story.. anyone who's ever driven a Miata knows this. But the specs are important to a lot of buyers and can ultimately influence them to purchase a car (sometimes even prior to test driving it) because they feel like they're getting more. They want the "best" or "fastest" car and don't care about the driving experience (or practicality).

I love my '19 STI and the raw, mechanical driving feel that it offers. That, combined with its practicality, is largely why I bought it. There aren't many cars left that offer this experience, especially as a package with AWD, 4 doors, and a manual transmission. The only other car left in that segment is the Golf R.. and most prefer that with the DSG. The manual transmission is a dying breed because they're slower, people are lazy and electric cars are the way of the future.

Anyways, sorry for rambling. We won't see any real performance changes for the 2020 model. We'll have to wait and see what the 2021 STI brings. Hopefully it's at least as fast as the S209, but with a smaller price tag.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
That's true, the STI is cheaper than the other cars mentioned. It's avoided price inflation and has held its base price pretty well compared to other vehicles. Granted they've been using the same general powertrain for 15 years so that probably helps cut their costs. But in 2004, the STI would have been competitive against the equivalent models of those cars.

2004 STI
MSRP ~$32k
300 HP @ 6000 rpm (@ 14.5 psi)
300 LB-FT @ 4000 rpm
0-60 mph: 4.6 sec
5-60 mph: 5.8 sec
1/4 mile: 13.2 sec
Skidpad: 0.90 G
Braking: 60-0 111 ft (70-0 166 ft)
Curb weight: 3260 lbs
LB/HP: 10.87

2019 STI
MSRP ~$37k
310 HP @ 6000 rpm (@ 16.2 psi)
290 LB-FT @ 4000-5200 rpm
0-60 mph: 5.4-5.7 sec
5-60 mpg: 6.9 sec
1/4 mile: 13.9 sec
Skidpad: 0.93 G
Braking: 60-0 109 ft (70-0 158 ft)
Curb weight: 3446 lbs
LB/HP: 11.12

As you can see, the new STI is worse in almost every way on the spec sheet. The appeal of the STI in the '00s was that it competed with much more expensive cars with bigger engines. Its performance hasn't changed much over the last 15 years while other cars have gotten much faster. Sure, the safety, interior, ride quality, and handling have improved, but it actually accelerates slower due to the added weight (almost 200 lbs).

The 2004 STI had performance numbers that were quite impressive for its time. For reference:
  • A 2004 Mustang GT had 260 HP/302 LB-FT, 0-60 in ~6 sec, and 1/4 mile in high 14s. The 2019 Mustang GT has 460 HP/420 LB-FT, 0-60 in 3.9 sec, and 1/4 mile in high 11s. The '04 STI was closer in performance to the more powerful & expensive Mustang Cobra "Terminator" (supercharged v8) in terms of 0-60 & 1/4 mile times. Now the STI is more on par with the cheaper Mustang EcoBoost (turbo 4)..
  • The '04 STI was very similar in performance to the M3 of the time. Now the BMW M2 Comp does 0-60 in 4.0 sec and 1/4 mile in 12.4 sec.
I think some would pay more for a STI that was more competitive performance-wise. I think a large part of the problem is that Subaru doesn't feel a need to spend the money and make any real performance improvements. People are still buying the STI, it accounts for a very low portion of their sales, and it has no direct competition with the Evo & Focus RS out of the picture. The CTR is better in almost every way, but it's FWD and over-styled (IMO). And loyal Subaru enthusiasts are willing to pay $50k+ for limited editions that are marginally faster. Don't get me wrong, I think it's great that Subaru is finally offering the S209 in the US, but I wouldn't pay $60k+ for it.

Disclaimer:
A performance spec sheet doesn't tell the whole story.. anyone who's ever driven a Miata knows this. But the specs are important to a lot of buyers and can ultimately influence them to purchase a car (sometimes even prior to test driving it) because they feel like they're getting more. They want the "best" or "fastest" car and don't care about the driving experience (or practicality).

I love my '19 STI and the raw, mechanical driving feel that it offers. That, combined with its practicality, is largely why I bought it. There aren't many cars left that offer this experience, especially as a package with AWD, 4 doors, and a manual transmission. The only other car left in that segment is the Golf R.. and most prefer that with the DSG. The manual transmission is a dying breed because they're slower, people are lazy and electric cars are the way of the future.

Anyways, sorry for rambling. We won't see any real performance changes for the 2020 model. We'll have to wait and see what the 2021 STI brings. Hopefully it's at least as fast as the S209, but with a smaller price tag.
I'm astonished by those stats... It's hard for me to remember how much more impressive the STI was compared to the competition when it first came to the US.

Also, how do I "like" a post? is that functionality that will be unlocked after a certain number of posts?
 
101 - 120 of 134 Posts
Top