| STI Forum | Shop | Sponsors | Advertise | Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | ||
| Home | Register | Today's Posts | Go Premium | Mark Forums Read | Create a Member Journal | Vendor Deals | Member Classifieds |
| | #1 |
| STI Driver Car: 05 STi Fav Mod: 100 octane map Location: Orlando Posts: 217
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2005 Trader Rating: (0) | Just as the title says, what is the difference? This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Spec C Club Car: 04 STi Fav Mod: sleeved ej257 + GT35R Location: Southern California Posts: 1,205
IWSTI Addict since: Jun 2004 Trader Rating: (0) | Here's the really short version--Water isn't combustible. Methanol has an octane rating and combusts...water just cools the charge(since it has a high specific heat) so you can run leaner AFRs without a fear of detonation, methanol injection raises octane(which is a measure of resistance to knock) so you can also run leaner AFRs. Methanol is corrosive so it's best to run a blend of water and methanol. You will see better results with methanol than with water if you're looking for power(per what I've read Aquamist representatives say)...but you should run a combo of the two. This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| |
| |