| STI Forum | Shop | Sponsors | Advertise | Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | ||
| Home | Register | Today's Posts | Go Premium | New Posts | | Mark Forums Read | Create a Member Journal | Vendor Deals | Member Classifieds |
| | #51 |
| n00b Feedback Score: 12 reviews
Car: 05 OBP STi My Stuff: Subaru Parts Fav Mod: GT35R Location: Phillipsburg, NJ Posts: 12,174
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2004 | i drove an SS since i work at chevy i think it took 10 seconds to wind through 2nd gear, while the sti takes 2. it's slow |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Lurker Feedback Score: 0 reviews Car: 01 Subaru WRX STi Spec C Fav Mod: Coming Soon Posts: 3
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2005 | Quote: Originally Posted by brifriinc accually if you read further into the post, you'll see that those are the gear ratio's for the base 5 speed cobalt. The closest 1:1 ratio is in fact 3rd gear on the SS/SC The FGP F35 transmission in the SS/SC 1st- 3.38:1 2nd- 1.76:1 3rd- 1.18:1 4th- 0.89:1 5th- 0.70:1 Just like the car you raced isnt and sti, you cant do math, if you'll notice the closest gear ratio is 4th with a loss of .11 and actually youd be making a little bit more power, where as in third you would be overating your car, that was even noted by other users at this site in your original post asking about your dyno... , you dumb kike This was my post, the guy is just retarded, he puts car lovers down to levels unknown until now. |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Lurker Feedback Score: 0 reviews Car: 01 Subaru WRX STi Spec C Fav Mod: Coming Soon Posts: 3
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2005 | hHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA they banned that login over at the site, and "finally" locked the thread, thats hilarious, stilou i think they may have banned you too, sorry bud. |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Junior STI Driver Feedback Score: 0 reviews Posts: 148
IWSTI Addict since: May 2005 | yea they banned me for no reason....tools |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Professional STI Racer Feedback Score: 0 reviews Fav Mod: Rod, Todd and Ned Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 662
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2005 | STi_Lou > Johnny Cochrane |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Grassroots STI Racer Feedback Score: 0 reviews Location: Maryland Posts: 532
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2004 | so...colbot owners are gay like srt-owners |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Lurker Feedback Score: 0 reviews Car: 01 Subaru WRX STi Spec C Fav Mod: Coming Soon Posts: 3
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2005 | Just wait guys, my friend and i are going to recreate his video... only better, ill let you know when we do it its gonna be hillarious. |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Banned Feedback Score: 0 reviews Car: '05 Subaru WRX STi Fav Mod: Any mod that enhances performance Location: Frederick, MD Posts: 937
IWSTI Addict since: May 2005 | That guy was a total tool. The thread has since been closed. The only guy with any sense seemed to be the guy posting about the power/weight ratios. He's right. A lot of STis do seem to dyno at around 225whp. That really surprises me though, because my STi feels just as fast as my Camaro acceleration-wise, and the Camaro's probably putting down about 280whp. On the highway, my STi pulls pretty freakin' hard once the turbo spools. I'm just running a Cobb AP Stage I and a K&N filter (which I doubt does much of anything). I just find it hard to believe that STis are dynoing that low, considering their acceleration. I know AWD surely helps a launch, but being rated at around 0-60 in 5.0, it has to be making more than 225whp. I'm at a loss. I'm totally dumbfounded...... |
| | |
| | #59 |
| Spec C Club Feedback Score: 7 reviews
Car: 2005 CGM STi Fav Mod: Process West V-Mount IC Location: Port Orchard, WA Posts: 1,015
IWSTI Addict since: Dec 2004 | Ive been seeing 240ish on stock STi's, I know my Stage II is 282whp. Im sure that just comes down to different dynos = different numbers. |
| | |
| | #60 | |
| Banned Feedback Score: 0 reviews Car: '05 Subaru WRX STi Fav Mod: Any mod that enhances performance Location: Frederick, MD Posts: 937
IWSTI Addict since: May 2005 | Quote:
It's a double-edged sword for me, really. While I'd like to have high numbers just for purposes of self gratification, at the same time I'd like to have accurate numbers as well. I guess if I dyno low on one type, and then dyno on another type, I'd be tickled to see the difference in the numbers...... | |
| | |
| | ||
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| New To Site? | Need Help? | More |