| STI Forum | Shop | Sponsors | Advertise | Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | ||
| Home | Register | Today's Posts | Go Premium | Mark Forums Read | Create a Member Journal | Vendor Deals | Member Classifieds |
| | #1 |
| Senior STI Driver Car: DGM 08 STI Fav Mod: Proudly mod-free since 2008 Location: Southern CA Posts: 302
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | As part of my demise into the doldrums of fuel economy, I have been reading various articles online. I notice folks say warmer climate contributes to better gas mileage. Okay I understand if your metal parts and fluids are damn near frozen, or at least very cold, that the friction is higher, thus bad MPG. I get that. But why, for example, do people claim better MPG when it's 95 degrees out versus 75 degrees out? I mean, that whole friction argument doesn't seem to be relevant in this temperature range. Furthermore, the chemistry corner of my brain remembers the Ideal Gas Law, suggesting colder air is denser and thus has more oxygen in it for the combustion process. So, shouldn't cooler air contribute to better MPG? After all, isn't that why CAI companies boast not only extra power, but extra fuel economy? Please elighten. Thank you. This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Swollen Member Car: 2004 PSM STi Fav Mod: Napalm Injection. Location: South of Heaven, CO. Posts: 1,042
IWSTI Addict since: May 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | I'm thinking the colder air (which is denser) would automatically include more gasoline in the mixture, therefore you'd use more gasoline when cold. The more air you put into the engine, the more fuel goes with it (given the same A/F ratio curve in the cold vs. warm conditions). Just off the top of my head. Interested to hear more on the subject..... |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior STI Driver Car: DGM 08 STI Fav Mod: Proudly mod-free since 2008 Location: Southern CA Posts: 302
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | ^^^This is true of course but then wouldn't the driver naturally compensate by pushing less pedal? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| STI Guru
Car: 05 CGM STi Fav Mod: grip. Location: Southeastern PA Posts: 5,817
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2006 Trader Rating: (7) | the gas quality also changes seasonally. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Amateur STI Driver | Its a not a one way straight line thingy. I distinctly remember reading a factory manual (Nissan or Skoda IIRC) where it showed a Fuel Consumption vs Ambient Temp graph and the Fuel Consumption was lowest at about 20 deg Celcius and goes down when its either hotter or colder. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gold Member Car: EDM WRX STI MY06 WRB Fav Mod: ghetto intake Location: Germany Posts: 1,213
IWSTI Addict since: Dec 2006 Trader Rating: (0) | I don´t believe it. If your theory is true, we all can get rid of our TMICs and FMICs I call it nonsense. The colder the better. It´s only the startup what kills the better mpg in cold weather. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Silver Member Car: Blue 08 WRX STi Fav Mod: ProTune from Jorge at P&L Posts: 120
IWSTI Addict since: May 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | I read somwhere that those hypermiler guys are working on a hai (hot air intake) to get even better gas milage, it might get better gas milage but hot air=low power. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Swollen Member Car: 2004 PSM STi Fav Mod: Napalm Injection. Location: South of Heaven, CO. Posts: 1,042
IWSTI Addict since: May 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | Haha...hot air intake! I love it! just yank the radiator out of your car and you'll be running hot (and saving gas!!) in no time! Then when the engine blows, you'll save a fortune on gas.... |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Junior STI Driver Car: Silver '08 STi w/BBS Fav Mod: WC Lathe Werks Copolymer Sphere Shift Knob Posts: 90
IWSTI Addict since: Jan 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | Cold air is dense and more difficult to drive through than warmer, less dense air. More drag equals less fuel efficiency. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Junior STI Driver | Quote:
Wow.... ![]() And I thought alcohol and other substances rid my brain of all its knowledgeable cells when I was in college...how did that stick around? | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Silver Member | Cold Air = Denser Air; Hot Air = Less Dense Air. Cold Compressed Air = Greater Explosive Potential Hot Compressed Air = Lower Explosive Potential than ^^ Less fuel is needed to create a burn with Cold Compressed Air than with Hot Compressed Air. Maybe wrong but I believe this is correct... For the best MPG you'd want the coldest air possible going into the engine (I get better mpg in the winter months) |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Junior STI Driver | not quite...like you said, cold air = denser. you can get more air into the cylinder when it's warmer, thus potentially increasing your afr. However, too hot and you lose the explosive power, like you mentioned. Therefore, there is a happy equilibrium, it's just hard to pinpoint |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Friendly Lurker Car: 08 STI Fav Mod: RCE Camber Plates Location: Maryland Posts: 1,990
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | They put additives in the gas when it is cold to prevent the fuel from freezing...this in trun reduces gas mileage. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Junior STI Driver | Quote:
What is the freezing point of unleaded gasoline? - Q&A | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Junior STI Driver | In this situations, it is best to look at the limits. Of course the limits are, no air, and air that is super dense. No air = no fuel = stand-still. Super dense = lots of fuel = lots of power (that you don't need when cruising on the freeway.) All to do with density and AFR. AFR being more or less constant throughout. The hotter is is, the less dense the air. Ergo, less air you have, the less fuel you need. But of course you get much less power because you aren't burning as much air and fuel. This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| |
| |