| STI Forum | Shop | Sponsors | Advertise | Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | ||
| Home | Register | Today's Posts | Go Premium | Mark Forums Read | Create a Member Journal | Vendor Deals | Member Classifieds |
| | #61 |
| Junior STI Driver | This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| | #62 |
| Professional STI Racer | Here are my statistics. I've owned a lot of Subarus since 1985. Six of them were bought brand new with between 5 and 20 miles on them. Two of the new ones were STi's. I broke in them per the manual. Put ****loads of miles on them (well except for the '05, just had to have an '08). And guess what? Not one problem from any of the engines. Not one. No oil use at all. No smoke. Nada. Nothing. My '08 doesn't use one drop of oil. I drive it hard. It doesn't knock, doesn't smoke, doesn't pull timing at 5200, none of the stuff that some are talking about here and on other threads. Maybe it's just luck, maybe not. But I know how I'll always break in my Subarus. ![]() -rain- |
| | |
| | #63 | |
| Spec C Club Car: 08 STi, SSM Location: Edmonds Washington Posts: 1,428
IWSTI Addict since: Dec 2005 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
If it breaks, it will get fixed. | |
| | |
| | #64 |
| Silver Member Car: Former 08 STI Owner Fav Mod: PB 08 EVO X GSR Location: Massachusetts Posts: 522
IWSTI Addict since: May 2008 Trader Rating: (1) | I want to see a distribution of the "performance gain." Does he provide this? Also, does he claim out of the 300+ samples that NONE of them experience a "performance loss?" |
| | |
| | #65 | |
| Professional STI Racer Car: DGM 2008 STI Fav Mod: 292 WHP!! 352 TQ!! RaWr Location: So-Cal Posts: 712
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
W0rd. Thats what i do every now and then. Chilll. | |
| | |
| | #66 |
| S204 Racer | |
| | |
| | #67 | |
| Junior STI Driver Car: DGM 08 STi Fav Mod: Stg 1 soon! Location: B-Lake WA Posts: 75
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2007 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
brandon | |
| | |
| | #68 |
| Professional STI Racer | I feel ya cookin. That's the big problem with doing the recommended break in. You gotta wait. It's sorta like sex. The longer you wait, the bluer your balls. But dude when it comes, look out! ![]() -rain- |
| | |
| | #69 |
| Silver Member
Car: 2008 OBP STi Fav Mod: Advan RS 18x9. TurboXS downpipe. Location: VA Posts: 750
IWSTI Addict since: Jan 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | The harder break-in has been proven on many cars and motorcycles in particular. Either way, its your car, choose what you're comfortable with |
| | |
| | #70 | |
| Professional STI Racer Car: DGM 2008 STI Fav Mod: 292 WHP!! 352 TQ!! RaWr Location: So-Cal Posts: 712
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
Seems like its going slower and slower just getting there lol Although my gas tanks are going faster and faster Weirddd lolol | |
| | |
| | #72 |
| Junior STI Driver Car: 07 WRB STI Fav Mod: Stage 2 + Protune Location: Bakersfield, CA Posts: 56
IWSTI Addict since: Sep 2007 Trader Rating: (0) | But then a lot of publications also state not to use sythetic oil for X amount of miles. What about cars that leave the factory with synthetic oil.. like Porsche, VW, BMW? And going with the gentle break in thing, Type Rs were track tested before they were shipped out to dealers. Theres so much conflicting info out there that I dont know who to believe. I did my own break in routine, which is kind of inbetween: under 4k for 300 miles (in the city where RPM varies a lot), low boost til 500 miles, couple runs til redline after that then called it broken in and got protuned @ ~800 miles.. then changed to synthetic @ 1k. |
| | |
| | #73 | |
| Junior STI Driver Car: UGM 2007 STI Limited Fav Mod: Coming Soon Location: Central Florida Posts: 122
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #74 |
| STI Driver Car: 08 WRB STi Fav Mod: Stage 1 Location: Calgary Posts: 239
IWSTI Addict since: Feb 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | my 2 cents a motor is a complex moving assembly where the sum of the parts is basically an average of multiple stacked tolerance fields, the manufacturers tend to err to the safe side to prevent additional warrantee claims. the more time that is spent ensuring that the tolerances on the components are within a narrow spec the better a motor will work. given the fact that machining processes have dramatically improved in the past couple of decades, the common wear surfaces require less time to "bed" in. i have seeen articles on factory tours of motor assembly plants where the engines were revved to redline repeatedly tho ensure that there was no imminent catastrophic failure due to a marginal casting/forging. YMMV |
| | |
| | #75 | |
| Junior STI Driver Car: UGM 2007 STI Limited Fav Mod: Coming Soon Location: Central Florida Posts: 122
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2008 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
Was this under load? Revving a free spinning engine to redline is completely different than beating up a new car. Many prop plane manufacturers will recommend what some would consider to be a "hard break in." This thread is about driving the cars hard for the first thousand miles not revving the engines to redline for a split second when they are not even in the car yet. This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. | |
| | |
| |
| |