| STI Forum | Shop | Sponsors | Advertise | Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | ||
| Home | Register | Today's Posts | Go Premium | Mark Forums Read | Create a Member Journal | Vendor Deals | Member Classifieds |
| | #16 | |
| Hungry Hungry Hoodscoop
Car: 32J GDFDYEH Fav Mod: Fullerton's Qrack on my car Location: Chicagoland Posts: 3,820
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2006 Trader Rating: (23) | Quote:
Great posts as always stretch. This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Amateur STI Driver | Quote:
You said you went to oversteer at -2.1 degrees. Do you have a stock anti-sway bar? Is everything else stock? | |
| | |
| | #18 | ||
| Silver Member
Car: Aspen 2005 STi Fav Mod: TurnInConcepts Coilovers Location: Silver Spring, MD Posts: 1,864
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2006 Trader Rating: (2) | The stock 0.9 degrees of negative camber is very insufficient for most setups. It does feel great if running a much larger rear sway bar than front since this alleviates the loads (stress) on the front tires. -0.9 with the stock front and 24mm rear sway bar feels outstanding and the front tires won't wear as unevenly. It seems to me that in practice, the more folks stress the front tires (via large front sway bars), the more camber they end up running. (Those are my observations, not from my own experience.) Quote:
Since you mentioned scrub radius, I'll mention that almost any modification to the car looks like it should ideally be accompanied with lower offset wheels. Quote:
This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. Last edited by stretch; 06-03-2008 at 05:09 AM. | ||
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| New To Site? | Need Help? | More |