STI Forum  |  Shop  |  Sponsors  |  Advertise Rules  |  FAQ  |  Members List  |  Calendar
IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums
 
Home  |  Register  |  Today's Posts  |  Go Premium Mark Forums Read Create a Member Journal  |  Vendor Deals  |  Member Classifieds

New IWSTI license plate promotion!PLEASE VOTE/RESPOND TO THIS THREAD!Special Order 2008+ IWSTI Gear!

Welcome to IWSTI.com, the largest STI specific forum on the internet, where you can interact with other STI enthusiasts, create a member journal, and receive answers to your questions. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please register today to start enjoying IWSTI membership privileges! Problem registering? Please contact support.
Go Back   IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums > STi Technical Discussion > Suspension, Handling, & Stiffening


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-02-2008, 09:10 AM   #16
Teh Other White Meat
 
Fav Mod: Fullerton's Qrack on my car
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,686
Join Date: Apr 2006
Trader Rating: (22)
How-To Contributor Award
Send a message via AIM to snorky
Default Re: 2005 STI front roll center, ride height, and suspension geometry analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by fullerton View Post
What about things that modify caster (ALK & Camber/Caster plates)? Will that do anything since the strut won't move up the same amount (as compared to the ground) per inch of compression?
the strut won't compress as much but the rest of the suspension will move the same amount with extra caster as without.

Great posts as always stretch.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
snorky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2008, 01:23 PM   #17
Amateur STI Driver
 
Car: 06 Subaru WRX STi
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 8
Join Date: Jun 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: 2005 STI front roll center, camber curve, and suspension geometry analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by MGizzle View Post
If you are runing stock getting more camber in the front will kill your understeer, if this is your only concern. I actually started loosing the tail too much when I went to camber bolts and -2.1deg and went back to stock bolts and -0.9deg in the front. Camber bolts suck, slip too much.
I have adjusted the camber as negative as the stock mounts will allow. The car is not well balanced...yet.

You said you went to oversteer at -2.1 degrees. Do you have a stock anti-sway bar? Is everything else stock?
scoobydo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 04:02 AM   #18
Silver Member
 
Fav Mod: TurnInConcepts.com Coilovers
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 1,784
Join Date: Mar 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to stretch
Default Re: 2005 STI front roll center, camber curve, and suspension geometry analysis

The stock 0.9 degrees of negative camber is very insufficient for most setups. It does feel great if running a much larger rear sway bar than front since this alleviates the loads (stress) on the front tires. -0.9 with the stock front and 24mm rear sway bar feels outstanding and the front tires won't wear as unevenly.

It seems to me that in practice, the more folks stress the front tires (via large front sway bars), the more camber they end up running. (Those are my observations, not from my own experience.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MGizzle View Post
Stretch, any idea if scrub (not scrub radius) will increase on the McPherson layout if we increase roll center?? I know it does on a double wishbone but not sure about our geometry. Hmmm...got to look into that one.
I think tire scrub is dependent on roll center height, not type of suspension. So, wishbones or struts, I think they should have the same amount of scrub so long as they were angled to have the same roll center height. Of course, the strut suspension will have more roll center migration in use, which may change the feel of things. Either way we're dealing with a suspension with a roll center near the ground, so scrub shouldn't be an issue. (Edit: unless you run the 6gun ball-joint extender on anything more than a slammed race car, then scrub and jacking forces could be an issue.) More important would be vertical roll center migration, since a changing roll center results in a car that won't settle in a turn.

Since you mentioned scrub radius, I'll mention that almost any modification to the car looks like it should ideally be accompanied with lower offset wheels.

Quote:
I actually requested pictures from friends of my car rolling at the track (my ride is stock) and I have 1-2 shoots where my entire inside (front and rear) is almost lifted off if not already up due to the enormous roll.
Explain? I know you know that body roll does not cause more than a percent of weight transfer; the rest is from Cg height.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.

Last edited by stretch : 06-03-2008 at 04:09 AM.
stretch is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed & Powered by Domain Architect