STI Forum  |  Shop  |  Sponsors  |  Advertise Rules  |  FAQ  |  Members List  |  Calendar
IWSTI.com: Subaru WRX STI Forums
 
iwsti
Home  |  Register  |  Today's Posts  |  Go Premium Mark Forums Read Create a Member Journal  |  Vendor Deals  |  Member Classifieds
 
Register at IWSTI.com for FREE
Refer IWSTI.com to a friend
Go Back   IWSTI.com: Subaru WRX STI Forums > GD Series STi Discussion (2003/4-2007) > GD-Technical > GD-Suspension, Handling, & Stiffening


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-06-2007, 08:35 AM   #46
Silver Member
 
Car: 2006 - CGM
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 828
IWSTI Addict since: Nov 2005
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4banger
If someone were to have RCE springs and an ALK, how bad would they scrape on the underside of their car?
I have both and do scrape over large speed bumps, but only when I have a couple people in the car. The spot that scrapes is the rear section of the subframe brace just behind the front wheels. Driving solo, I haven't had an issue. I'd like to replace the subframe brace with an after market version for better bracing, lighter weight and more clearance. However, I want to keep the stock engine cover and haven't found a brace that still works with it.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.

Last edited by Greg; 02-06-2007 at 10:55 AM.
Greg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 10:18 AM   #47
Junior STI Driver
 
Car: 05 STi
Fav Mod: the whole dang car!
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 65
IWSTI Addict since: Jan 2007
Trader Rating: (5)
Default

Here is a thought and a question:

Regarding spring rates I think it's a good idea to begin by considering the tires you plan on using and then think about how hard you are likely push them when cornering. You don't need and probably won't enjoy springs that are stiffer than that.

I've been meaning to ask Myles at RCE about his thoughts on the ideal spring rate for an 05 STi running stock RE070s. If anybody will know it's gotta be him--I doubt anyone has thought and experimented with STi springs more than he has. (I don't know how much this line of thinking is complicated by the choice of anti-roll bars.)

To put a finer point on it: Do the RCE springs have a higher spring rate than I need for either auto-x or 9/10s type HPDE driving at Watkins Glen? Those two are night and day, but that's what I plan on doing with my springs on my RE070s.

Not my intention to hijack the thread--my car is 99% daily driver and 1% track machine. So I'm really looking for a good DD setup.
Arrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 11:27 AM   #48
S204 Racer
 
Car: RIP 02 WRX
Fav Mod: 2004 Aspen White WRX STi
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,614
IWSTI Addict since: Dec 2005
Trader Rating: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtskibum16
You would recommend the pinks over the prodrives? Why exactly? I have been trying to decide between Pinks, Prodrives, and RCE. I want good handling while retaining day to day drivability. I want the performance of the RCE (and I'm not too concerned with the effects of stiffer rates) but I am worried they will be too low for me in the front since I have to drive in lots of snow in the winter and mountain service roads in the summer.
Prodrives are too mild in all aspects, IMO. The Pinks are a good, proven all around spring for a mild drop/performance boost. The RCEs will (as you said) lower you quite a bit, so I would avoid them.

Last edited by LOLSTi; 02-06-2007 at 11:31 AM.
LOLSTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 01:00 PM   #49
S204 Racer
 
Fav Mod: Dyslexia
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 3,351
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2004
Trader Rating: (13)
Send a message via AIM to RacerXS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LOLSTi
Prodrives are too mild in all aspects, IMO. The Pinks are a good, proven all around spring for a mild drop/performance boost. The RCEs will (as you said) lower you quite a bit, so I would avoid them.
I had Pinks & stock struts before I had my KW3's. I don't think there could be a better combination for the stock struts IMO, I REALLY liked them.
I did have the RCE lowering camber plates with them as well.....A really great setup for DD & an occasional track day/Auto-X IMO.
RacerXS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 01:54 PM   #50
Authorized Vendor
 
Car: 2008 Pinarello FP5
Fav Mod: New Underwear after a 147mph slide into turn 17 at Sebring in the rain....still got 3rd..
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 3,410
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2005
Trader Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to RaceComp Engineering
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg
Ok here's something you don't often hear about the Ohlins. On my stock KYB's I was only able to get -0.4 on one side and -0.7 with the stock camber bolts, and upper strut bearing. With the Ohlins installed, and the stock bolts set to full negative camber, the new results where 1.1 on both sides. This was with the RCE lowering springs so, with stock springs it might be closer to -1.5. So not only do the Ohlins add some negative camber, the mounting holes are more precisely drilled than those of the KYB's. Not really surprise from Ohlins, but I enjoyed the discovery just the same.

Before I go further, let me add that aftermarket camber bolts do have a tendency to loosen up from time to time. If you catch it quickly, it will cost you a new aligment. If you don't, then you might need to replace your tires as well. The cost to recover from a slipped bolt, and risk of my alignment settings "moving" disqualified the bolts, for me.

Given that the Ohlins will likely give you some camber and you are in need of crazy track camber, then you might be fine without bolts or plates. I wanted to replace the stock upper strut bearing with something firmer. So its a Group-N or a camber plate. Since I also wanted more camber, and bolts were not an option, Group-Ns were ruled out. That's how I got to the RCE plates.
Pretty much every one says you need a harder upper strut bearing. If you are going with the Ohlins and either the stock springs or similar wheel rate springs, then I think the stock tops are fine. But then again the title says something about Ultimate, so you are likely headed for something harder. Also I could consider a high degree of adjustablity a requirement for the ultimate suspension, for track or street. So we are now back to camber plates.

Personally I'd put the ALK in the mix as well. I think it will help the handling and characteristics of the car far more than half a degree of camber. Of all the suspension mods the ALK did the most to improve the feeling of being disconnected from the front wheels and improve the linear feel of the wheel under power on/off transitions.

Hope this helps. Keep the questions coming.
We found the same things with the fixed perch struts Greg. Consistent camber left to right is a nice plus. It's nice for Wagon WRX guys to get that little bit of extra camber too.


And just an FYI, all those 15 or so who recently ordered fixed perch Ohlins, they're on their way. We still have a couple left.


- Andrew
RaceComp Engineering is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 02:21 PM   #51
Moderator
 
Car: 05 Ram 3500 CTD
Fav Mod: Majin
Posts: 14,771
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2006
Trader Rating: (9)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LOLSTi
Prodrives are too mild in all aspects, IMO. The Pinks are a good, proven all around spring for a mild drop/performance boost. The RCEs will (as you said) lower you quite a bit, so I would avoid them.
Arent the rates of the Prodrives in between the Pinks and the RCE's?
lackskill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 02:40 PM   #52
Professional STI Driver
 
Car: 05 Subaru WRX STi
Location: Montana
Posts: 461
IWSTI Addict since: May 2006
Trader Rating: (1)
Default

^^^That is what I was thinking. Although, Prodrive never released the rates did they?
mtskibum16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 03:14 PM   #53
The Next Petter Solberg
 
Car: 08 Z06 Corvette
Fav Mod: Jack Jack
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 882
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2005
Trader Rating: (3)
Default

a few bits of misinformation...

Fixed perch often offers *greater* tire clearance than coilovers. The springs are bigger in diameter, but they are above the top of the tire. Most C/O's are not, and the 2.5" ID springs are larger in diameter than the strut tube of the fixed perch.

Coilovers and fixed perch harshness is relative to how well the dampening is set up for the springs. My 440/340 Ohlins when set are less harsh than any time Ive had the stock strut on. Remember that shock travel thing people hint at on the stock struts? Man it can make a mess for your ride or your handling.

So far, I havent heard of anyone raving more about a suspension than essentially anyone who gets the Ohlins fixed perches and adds the RCE springs. Use the non-lowering camber plates in front and the car shouldnt drag anywhere as long as you dont have some V-limited front lip on it.

If you dont plan on motorsports and you hate debugging noises, don't get a coilover.

Lastly, please dont get camber bolts unless you are willing to pay them alot of attention. I havent heard of any breaking recently, but they do often move. Camber plates create no extra NVH in my experience, and are far more safe and forgettable.
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 06:38 AM   #54
Junior STI Driver
 
Car: 07 sti limited
Fav Mod: stealth
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 142
IWSTI Addict since: Dec 2006
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

^^ great post thanks for sharing.
Sizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 07:04 AM   #55
Professional STI Driver
 
Car: 05 Subaru WRX STi
Location: Montana
Posts: 461
IWSTI Addict since: May 2006
Trader Rating: (1)
Default

Does anyone know how the Prodrive and Pink rates compare to each other? People seem to have mixed ideas.
mtskibum16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 07:13 AM   #56
Gold Member
 
Fav Mod: T2s and Recaros
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 3,329
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2005
Trader Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to twiSTies
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtskibum16
Does anyone know how the Prodrive and Pink rates compare to each other? People seem to have mixed ideas.
the prodrives are a little bit softer than the pinks.

i actually found the old spring rate chart on my PC at home. i'll make a new updated one for the forum.
twiSTies is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 07:13 AM   #57
Silver Member
 
Fav Mod: TurnInConcepts Coilovers
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 1,864
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to stretch
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ex-rex
it may not make a lick of sense to you, but the improvement in the corners is why i did it to my wrx. my stock tires more or less stopped squeeling after the spring install and i was driving 5 mph faster (at least) on every turn. bang for the buck, it was a good mod. i never had any problems with my stock struts after more than 17,000 miles, and 3 cornfields of turf'ing.

from what people have said in here, coilovers offer a fairly bumpy ride in comparison to the spring/strut setup. people like me, would like to have an alternative to that, but still make a signifigant improvement, if possible.

i understand the sti is different than the wrx, but to say you don't understand why people do it
The WRX starts with a higher ride height and has longer travel, twin-tube struts. It probably makes sense to lower the car as you're starting with more suspension travel. Still, I bet most of the gain you saw was from the additional camber you got as a side-effect of lowering, not from the lowering itself.

The STI, stock, already has too little suspension travel. It's a completely different situation. Subaru sacrificed suspension travel by going to a monotube strut design- monotubes take up more space, which forced Subaru to use less strut stroke. The car rides on the bump stops and the bump stops nearly double the car's spring rate. This is a fact, I'm not trying to fool you or anything. The predictable consequences account for nearly all of the popular complaints about the STI's handling.

I'm not saying that lowering the car is bad, I'm saying that giving up more suspension travel is bad. Very bad. So, to lower the STI properly, measures have to be taken to increase suspension travel either via shorter bump stops or, preferably, shorter struts. The latter means getting coilovers, but we're talking about street setups here.

For a street setup the stock springs rates (or more specifically, the wheel rates) are already as firm as coilover kits for most other four door cars. They're plenty stiff if paired with decent sway bars. Replacing the awful stock bump stops with shorter ones is all it takes to make the car handle drastically better while improving the car's ride. Paired with sway bars, the combination is pretty fantastic. And cheap.

Now, the stock struts aren't that great, so Ohlins will still improve much. A good damper is invaluable. However, Ohlins are not shorter than the stock struts, and keeping suspension travel is paramount for a fast street setup. Thus, I maintain:

Ohlins
RCE lowering camber plates
STOCK springs
24-27mm sways

On the cheap, cut your stock bump stops instead of buying Ohlins.

Last edited by stretch; 02-08-2007 at 07:32 AM.
stretch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 07:18 AM   #58
Moderator
 
Car: 05 Ram 3500 CTD
Fav Mod: Majin
Posts: 14,771
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2006
Trader Rating: (9)
Default

Pinks have a rate of 257 lbs/inch front, 217 lbs/inch rear. I cant find a rate for the STi version of the prodrive spring. The rates listed here and on scoobymods are for the GC8 impreza prodrives.
lackskill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:01 AM   #59
Junior STI Driver
 
Car: 05 WRB STi/Silver
Fav Mod: Valentine 1
Location: MD
Posts: 67
IWSTI Addict since: Dec 2006
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to ex-rex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stretch
The WRX starts with a higher ride height and has longer travel, twin-tube struts. It probably makes sense to lower the car as you're starting with more suspension travel. Still, I bet most of the gain you saw was from the additional camber you got as a side-effect of lowering, not from the lowering itself.

The STI, stock, already has too little suspension travel. It's a completely different situation. Subaru sacrificed suspension travel by going to a monotube strut design- monotubes take up more space, which forced Subaru to use less strut stroke. The car rides on the bump stops and the bump stops nearly double the car's spring rate. This is a fact, I'm not trying to fool you or anything. The predictable consequences account for nearly all of the popular complaints about the STI's handling.

I'm not saying that lowering the car is bad, I'm saying that giving up more suspension travel is bad. Very bad. So, to lower the STI properly, measures have to be taken to increase suspension travel either via shorter bump stops or, preferably, shorter struts. The latter means getting coilovers, but we're talking about street setups here.

For a street setup the stock springs rates (or more specifically, the wheel rates) are already as firm as coilover kits for most other four door cars. They're plenty stiff if paired with decent sway bars. Replacing the awful stock bump stops with shorter ones is all it takes to make the car handle drastically better while improving the car's ride. Paired with sway bars, the combination is pretty fantastic. And cheap.

Now, the stock struts aren't that great, so Ohlins will still improve much. A good damper is invaluable. However, Ohlins are not shorter than the stock struts, and keeping suspension travel is paramount for a fast street setup. Thus, I maintain:

Ohlins
RCE lowering camber plates
STOCK springs
24-27mm sways

On the cheap, cut your stock bump stops instead of buying Ohlins.
<----owned

thanks for the detailed explanation. your last post explains your point a lot better than before.
ex-rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:21 AM   #60
Moderator
 
Car: 05 Ram 3500 CTD
Fav Mod: Majin
Posts: 14,771
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2006
Trader Rating: (9)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stretch
The WRX starts with a higher ride height and has longer travel, twin-tube struts. It probably makes sense to lower the car as you're starting with more suspension travel. Still, I bet most of the gain you saw was from the additional camber you got as a side-effect of lowering, not from the lowering itself.

The STI, stock, already has too little suspension travel. It's a completely different situation. Subaru sacrificed suspension travel by going to a monotube strut design- monotubes take up more space, which forced Subaru to use less strut stroke. The car rides on the bump stops and the bump stops nearly double the car's spring rate. This is a fact, I'm not trying to fool you or anything. The predictable consequences account for nearly all of the popular complaints about the STI's handling.

I'm not saying that lowering the car is bad, I'm saying that giving up more suspension travel is bad. Very bad. So, to lower the STI properly, measures have to be taken to increase suspension travel either via shorter bump stops or, preferably, shorter struts. The latter means getting coilovers, but we're talking about street setups here.

For a street setup the stock springs rates (or more specifically, the wheel rates) are already as firm as coilover kits for most other four door cars. They're plenty stiff if paired with decent sway bars. Replacing the awful stock bump stops with shorter ones is all it takes to make the car handle drastically better while improving the car's ride. Paired with sway bars, the combination is pretty fantastic. And cheap.

Now, the stock struts aren't that great, so Ohlins will still improve much. A good damper is invaluable. However, Ohlins are not shorter than the stock struts, and keeping suspension travel is paramount for a fast street setup. Thus, I maintain:

Ohlins
RCE lowering camber plates
STOCK springs
24-27mm sways

On the cheap, cut your stock bump stops instead of buying Ohlins.
I thought this baby was gone? All lowering springs (and even stock springs) ride on the bump stops!

^^^ The bumpstop thread LIVES!!!


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
lackskill is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


New To Site? Need Help? More

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed & Powered by Domain Architect