[Grey Ghost]

Originally Posted by AutoMaster

-Rob

lol ya...i just wanted you guys to back your thread thats all. I know piss face nolag04 so i know how you guys do up there at the shop..

[AutoMaster]

Originally Posted by Grey Ghost

lol ya...i just wanted you guys to back your thread thats all. I know piss face nolag04 so i know how you guys do up there at the shop..

Not a problem.




-Rob

[trevor]

Originally Posted by AutoMaster

A 606whp increase over factory sounds inefficient to you? A GT42R has 1000hp rating. This mean 1000hp FLYWHEEL. All turbochargers are advertised at flywheel HP numbers.

Disclaimer:

Our dyno reads stock STi as 200whp.




-Rob

That's a LOT of boost for that little power, that turbo should make between 900-1000whp with that much boost in it. Out of curiosity what did it make on 40lbs?

[AutoMaster]

Originally Posted by trevor

That's a LOT of boost for that little power, that turbo should make between 900-1000whp with that much boost in it.

On a higher ready dyno such as a dyno jet, you are correct with the WHP statement. But on our dyno this will not happen. The 42R is rated for
1000HP flywheel, it is impossible for it to make 1000WHP. That would mean you have ZERO drivetrain loss.



-Rob

[trevor]

Originally Posted by AutoMaster

On a higher ready dyno such as a dyno jet, you are correct with the WHP statement. But on our dyno this will not happen. The 42R is rated for
1000HP flywheel, it is impossible for it to make 1000WHP. That would mean you have ZERO drivetrain loss.



-Rob

Or it could be underrated...? By that statement you're saying that a GT35R can't make over 550whp.

An AMS Evolution 8 made 974whp through the GT42R

[AutoMaster]

Originally Posted by trevor

Or it could be underrated...? By that statement you're saying that a GT35R can't make over 550whp.

An AMS Evolution 8 made 974whp through the GT42R

You are still missing the point. On our dyno, the vehicle puts down 200whp bone stock. So with that turbocharger we made a 606whp increase. Again, this is also a hybrid turbocharger on this vehicle which was mentioned earlier in the thread.


On AMS dyno, a stock evo puts down 270-280whp. So if you made 380whp, that is a 100whp increae over factory.


Comparing and EVO to an STi is apples to oranges.




-Rob

[trevor]

Originally Posted by AutoMaster

You are still missing the point. On our dyno, the vehicle puts down 200whp bone stock. So with that turbocharger we made a 606whp increase. Again, this is also a hybrid turbocharger on this vehicle which was mentioned earlier in the thread.


On AMS dyno, a stock evo puts down 270-280whp. So if you made 380whp, that is a 100whp increae over factory.


Comparing and EVO to an STi is apples to oranges.




-Rob

You were questioning the turbochargers ability to make a certain amount of power buddy.

[AutoMaster]

Originally Posted by trevor

You were questioning the turbochargers ability to make a certain amount of power buddy.

I think you are mistaken.


Your words:

Originally Posted by trevor

That's a LOT of boost for that little power, that turbo should make between 900-1000whp with that much boost in it.

I was stating the turbcharger is rated 1000hp, so can not make 1000whp.


Some dynamometers (dyno) read different/higher than others.



-Rob

[trevor]

You're saying a turbo rated to 1000 "crank" hp can't make close to 1000whp.. lol I'm telling you and showing you that you're mistaken.

[AutoMaster]

Originally Posted by trevor

You're saying a turbo rated to 1000 "crank" hp can't make close to 1000whp.. lol I'm telling you and showing you that you're mistaken.

I understand that. Here is another way to look at what I am saying. A Subaru STi is rated 300hp flywheel. So there for it can not make 300hp @ the ground.

Your argument is that you have seen it make this power at the ground. I am simply stating that the HP you are claiming was on a higher reading dyno.





-Rob