IW STi Forum banner

2008 Rear Suspension Part I: Travel

1 reading
67K views 91 replies 42 participants last post by  derkahn  
#1 · (Edited)
This can get a bit long winded so I'm going to break it down into sections. Sure, I'd like to sit here and type it all in one go, but I just don't have that huge of a chunk of time, and the second section of this is going to require some pics and drawings or nobody will get what I'm talking about. That, and I really want to try and get the brakes changed on the SVX today.

So, to start things off we'll talk about travel and lowering your 2008. We'll keep this confined to the rear of the car as the front hasn't changed much from the older models.

We'll start with this with some measurements.

At stock ride height you're sitting at 14.625" from hub center to fender lip.
At full bump you're sitting at 12.0"
At full droop you're sitting at 18.75"

These measurements were taken first with the car on the ground, and unloaded to get the stock height.

We then removed the spring so we could jack the wheel through it's full motion.

This means that:
Bump travel at the wheel 2.625"
Droop travel at the wheel 4.125"

Truth is, the bump travel sucks, and the droop travel is just ok. As an aside, the spring does not coilbind, and actually has a good bit of room for more bump travel.

Another thing that we noticed was the rear bump stop. It's rather long. It's also just about touching the top of the strut top at stock ride height. This means that any action you have back there in the way of bump actually starts to engage the bumper.

Since a bumper is basically a progressive spring this means that you are adding to the spring rate in the rear in a progressive manner. Go more into the bump stop, and you get a higher rate.

While ok for ride, this is not so good for handling. When it comes to handling progressive springs are hard to predict when entering a turn. This is why good aftermarket performance springs only have a small amount of progression and is pretty close to nill at stock ride height. Notice I said good springs.

So, lets say you want to lower the car. Well, here's the problem.

1) You don't have much bump travel to begin with, and you'll only make it worse.
2) You'll be deeper into the bump stops to begin with. Sure you have stiffer springs, but now you've made them stiffer still with the engagement of the bumper.
3) Rear toe and bump steer gets awful (more on this on the second part of the paper)

Now, how can we correct this? There's a few ways we can START to address the problem.

1) if you are using the stock rear dampers do not lower the car with just springs. Even if they are stiffer springs we have found that the car will suddenly overcome the rear grip and unpredictably step out on you. Not a good thing.

2) You can cut the rear bump stops or get new shorter ones. We've actually suggested this a few times to folks now. The idea is to let the car move in bump a little more before engaging the bumper and hope that the event (the corner or bump) is over before you get too deep into the bumper.

3) There a cage on the top of the stock strut. You can cut that off, and it'll give you a little bit (like .25") of bump travel. Here's the deal with that cage - it creates air space and an exit path so when the bumper hits the top of the damper it doesn't shove air into the top seal. A good example is the party trick of a beer bottle. The one where you fill the bottle complete with water all the way up the mouth. You then slap the palm of your hand down on the top, and the bottom of the bottle breaks out in a perfect circle. Cool for a party. Bad for your dampers. So, if you cut that cage off you'll need something to let the air out from between the bumper and the strut top. This is known as an aerator disk. It's simply a washer (usually plastic of some type) with a slot cut in it so it looks a little like pacman. This gives the air a space to get out instead of through the upper seal. Despite this I do NOT recommend cutting the cage off.

4) You can get a new damper. One with a shorter body, and a decent amount of travel. Sure you could get a cheap damper with 3/4" of travel, but that's really not the point is it?

We'll work with stock numbers here so no lowering taken into account. We've got 6.75" of travel back there to play with given the stock damper. All other things being equal we would like to see that even out a bit for bump and rebound. You can't do a straight up 50/50 split. The reason being that when you're in a turn you've got plenty of grip on the bump side, but if you're fully compressed on the loaded side you can pretty much anticipate that you'll be fully decompressed on the unloaded side. Now, add tire flex into there and you're beyond an already barely touching tire on the unloaded side.

As we know from inside rear tire lift on the old cars a tire in the air means no go. Even with all the diffs you just don't have enough locking factor in the diffs to account for a tire in the air. That means you have to wait for the tire to settle back onto the ground before you get on it. Not good.

So what we need is a damper that sets us up with a little bit of an uneven split. While I have not figured out exact numbers something like a 45/55 or 48/52 bump/rebound split would work nicely I believe. So you're looking at 3.0375-3.24" of bump travel if you look at those numbers. Keep in mind this will also depend on the tires although if you're on flexy all seasons or winters I'm going to hope that you're not going all out.

Given this what can we do? Well, if we're talking the same overall length of body and shaft at rest we need a strut that's going to have a shorter body than stock, and be very efficient in travel. At this time I am not aware of any that fall into the category.

There's another thing we can do, but I need to do some research on it as it will require a part, and I don't want to give it all away just yet. At least let me be first to market on some things. ;)

On the subject of coilovers - the answer is MAYBE. I know the numbers for the AST. I do not know them for the KW, Ohlins, Cusco, BC or any others that are now offered for the 08. If folks have that info I would appreciate it.

So, in conclusion here's what we have:

  • Rear bump travel sucks
  • Lowering with just springs at this point in time is NOT the way to go for handling. Unless all you want is looks. If it comes to that I can't help you. Not being a jerk, just being honest. We're function over form shop, so we don't worry about how cool stuff looks.
  • Cut or replace stock bumpers
  • Find a better damper or go to good coilovers (hard to do at this point in time, but it's being worked by us and RCE).


Next up on the agenda:
  • Rear toe control and rear bump steer
  • Rear camber and its control.
 
#4 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

Interesting, a buddy of mine I was talking to was telling me to wait for 2010 model cause the GR's had an issue with the suspension. He refused to go into specifics but he said there was a huge overlooked screwup on the suspension. I think I see what he's saying now =X Jeez now I may have to wait till the 2010 model =/
 
#5 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

Interesting, a buddy of mine I was talking to was telling me to wait for 2010 model cause the GR's had an issue with the suspension. He refused to go into specifics but he said there was a huge overlooked screwup on the suspension. I think I see what he's saying now =X Jeez now I may have to wait till the 2010 model =/
Um? 2010? Has any info been released on those?
 
#7 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

Great read, thanks guys :)

What about the Ohlins for the 08?
On the subject of coilovers - the answer is MAYBE. I know the numbers for the AST. I do not know them for the KW, Ohlins, Cusco, BC or any others that are now offered for the 08. If folks have that info I would appreciate it.
 
#12 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

Just to make sure I'm on the same page here. You're saying that its not worth doing lowering springs as a handling mod unless you shorten the bump stops?

I'd like to see what you and RCE are working on in the future. I was keeping my eye out for their 08 springs.
 
#13 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

Just to make sure I'm on the same page here. You're saying that its not worth doing lowering springs as a handling mod unless you shorten the bump stops?

I'd like to see what you and RCE are working on in the future. I was keeping my eye out for their 08 springs.
At this point yes. There's other points coming up in more articles that clarify more problems with lowering the car, but as of this point - that is correct. In my opinion you give up too much bump travel to make the lowering trade-off worth it.
 
#18 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

just to get a better comparison idea, what is the stock bump and droop travel for GDB? I'm not sure if 04-07 had any changes in terms suspension travel.

Thanks again for the useful findings.
You know - I don't remember. For some reason 9" of total travel in the rear sticks in my head though, but don't quote me on that.
 
#21 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

This can get a bit long winded so I'm going to break it down into sections. Sure, I'd like to sit here and type it all in one go, but I just don't have that huge of a chunk of time, and the second section of this is going to require some pics and drawings or nobody will get what I'm talking about. That, and I really want to try and get the brakes changed on the SVX today.

So, to start things off we'll talk about travel and lowering your 2008. We'll keep this confined to the rear of the car as the front hasn't changed much from the older models.

We'll start with this with some measurements.

At stock ride height you're sitting at 14.625" from hub center to fender lip.
At full bump you're sitting at 12.0"
At full droop you're sitting at 18.75"

These measurements were taken first with the car on the ground, and unloaded to get the stock height.

We then removed the spring so we could jack the wheel through it's full motion.

This means that:
Bump travel at the wheel 2.625"
Droop travel at the wheel 4.125"

Truth is, the bump travel sucks, and the droop travel is just ok. As an aside, the spring does not coilbind, and actually has a good bit of room for more bump travel.

Another thing that we noticed was the rear bump stop. It's rather long. It's also just about touching the top of the strut top at stock ride height. This means that any action you have back there in the way of bump actually starts to engage the bumper.

Since a bumper is basically a progressive spring this means that you are adding to the spring rate in the rear in a progressive manner. Go more into the bump stop, and you get a higher rate.

While ok for ride, this is not so good for handling. When it comes to handling progressive springs are hard to predict when entering a turn. This is why good aftermarket performance springs only have a small amount of progression and is pretty close to nill at stock ride height. Notice I said good springs.

So, lets say you want to lower the car. Well, here's the problem.

1) You don't have much bump travel to begin with, and you'll only make it worse.
2) You'll be deeper into the bump stops to begin with. Sure you have stiffer springs, but now you've made them stiffer still with the engagement of the bumper.
3) Rear toe and bump steer gets awful (more on this on the second part of the paper)

Now, how can we correct this? There's a few ways we can START to address the problem.

1) if you are using the stock rear dampers do not lower the car with just springs. Even if they are stiffer springs we have found that the car will suddenly overcome the rear grip and unpredictably step out on you. Not a good thing.

2) You can cut the rear bump stops or get new shorter ones. We've actually suggested this a few times to folks now. The idea is to let the car move in bump a little more before engaging the bumper and hope that the event (the corner or bump) is over before you get too deep into the bumper.

3) There a cage on the top of the stock strut. You can cut that off, and it'll give you a little bit (like .25") of bump travel. Here's the deal with that cage - it creates air space and an exit path so when the bumper hits the top of the damper it doesn't shove air into the top seal. A good example is the party trick of a beer bottle. The one where you fill the bottle complete with water all the way up the mouth. You then slap the palm of your hand down on the top, and the bottom of the bottle breaks out in a perfect circle. Cool for a party. Bad for your dampers. So, if you cut that cage off you'll need something to let the air out from between the bumper and the strut top. This is known as an aerator disk. It's simply a washer (usually plastic of some type) with a slot cut in it so it looks a little like pacman. This gives the air a space to get out instead of through the upper seal. Despite this I do NOT recommend cutting the cage off.

4) You can get a new damper. One with a shorter body, and a decent amount of travel. Sure you could get a cheap damper with 3/4" of travel, but that's really not the point is it?

We'll work with stock numbers here so no lowering taken into account. We've got 6.75" of travel back there to play with given the stock damper. All other things being equal we would like to see that even out a bit for bump and rebound. You can't do a straight up 50/50 split. The reason being that when you're in a turn you've got plenty of grip on the bump side, but if you're fully compressed on the loaded side you can pretty much anticipate that you'll be fully decompressed on the unloaded side. Now, add tire flex into there and you're beyond an already barely touching tire on the unloaded side.

As we know from inside rear tire lift on the old cars a tire in the air means no go. Even with all the diffs you just don't have enough locking factor in the diffs to account for a tire in the air. That means you have to wait for the tire to settle back onto the ground before you get on it. Not good.

So what we need is a damper that sets us up with a little bit of an uneven split. While I have not figured out exact numbers something like a 45/55 or 48/52 bump/rebound split would work nicely I believe. So you're looking at 3.0375-3.24" of bump travel if you look at those numbers. Keep in mind this will also depend on the tires although if you're on flexy all seasons or winters I'm going to hope that you're not going all out.

Given this what can we do? Well, if we're talking the same overall length of body and shaft at rest we need a strut that's going to have a shorter body than stock, and be very efficient in travel. At this time I am not aware of any that fall into the category.

There's another thing we can do, but I need to do some research on it as it will require a part, and I don't want to give it all away just yet. At least let me be first to market on some things. ;)

On the subject of coilovers - the answer is MAYBE. I know the numbers for the AST. I do not know them for the KW, Ohlins, Cusco, BC or any others that are now offered for the 08. If folks have that info I would appreciate it.

So, in conclusion here's what we have:
  • Rear bump travel sucks
  • Lowering with just springs at this point in time is NOT the way to go for handling. Unless all you want is looks. If it comes to that I can't help you. Not being a jerk, just being honest. We're function over form shop, so we don't worry about how cool stuff looks.
  • Cut or replace stock bumpers
  • Find a better damper or go to good coilovers (hard to do at this point in time, but it's being worked by us and RCE).

Next up on the agenda:
  • Rear toe control and rear bump steer
  • Rear camber and its control.


:tup:

Awsome white paper...
 
#22 · (Edited)
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

As promised, 30 Series Mono Tube Koni DA's
W/ the OE bottom collar welded on, re-used the OE bottom spring perch with a custom block spacer below it for ride height.

The down side to these is the bump adjustment, you have to take de-install them to adjust it. You can see the adjuster for the rebound in the other pics.


Doesn't look like much work to build these and or that visually impressive.
But, I can crank the damping forces up to 1500 lbs rebound :)
I have yet to go that stiff actually more like 1.25 turns out of 2.5 is my race setting to date.

The fronts were labor intensive to un-invert and make them serviceable.


Image


more pics here http://ploney.shackspace.com/pics/STI/konis
 
#24 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

Great write up guys...I will be following your research closely....

FWIW, Myles was telling me that the KWs have a bunch more travel than the Ohlins currently available. (Enough so that I went ahead and ordered a set.)

I will post some numbers when I get them in (2-3 weeks probably), but I know several other folks have these already so it would be nice to hear what they have to say...
 
#28 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

would that explain the shifter cart like suspension i feel when i set the car hard in a tight banked corner??(IE riding the bump stops)(kinda stiff hoppy feeling)
My question exactly. On the power hard in tight corners (banked or not) gets pretty hoppy at outside rear. Feels underdamped with a high spring rate, which would be explained by running on the stops. OTOH, I thought maybe this was an artifact of the DCCD/LSD action. Thoughts?

I'd like to do coilovers when I can be sure that the right solution exists. I'm curious about the KW and the Ohlins too. Frankly the Ohlins, if it is up to their usual standards, looks like it could be worth it when you factor in the included hardware.
 
#26 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

So on lowering springs only, an 08 will be riding on both front and rear bump stops.
 
#30 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

we're waiting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
#32 · (Edited)
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

here's a good question, subaru said the new rear suspension is "better" than the old setup on the GD chassis, is this true? or only true to an extent..
I think a lot of people in this thread are jumping to the wrong conclusion and reading too much into his post. I don't believe Clint is in any way saying the rear suspension is bad or deficient. What he is saying is that, when using aftermarket springs, the rear suspension needs to be addressed in a smarter and more thoughtout fashion than the old car; i.e. you can't just slap lowering springs on and think you'll have better handling.

Hell, ever since MY05 the front suspension has had the same issue with lowering springs - this is not a new thing people. We've always had to consider the ramifications of using lowering springs without trimming or replacing the bumpstops. With '08 we now have to consider the rear suspension as well.

Ask yourself this: how many people just put lowering springs on the rear? Since no one does this, in my opinion, the real problem was and still is the lack of front travel on a lowered car. The only difference with the '08 is now we have to worry about the rears as well.

RCE has a good set of springs for the '05-'07 because they spent time ensuring that their springs were matched to the struts. In my opinion, if you just slap on any old lowering spring, you're likely asking the strut to do more than it was designed for and won't realize maximum performance potential.

For my car, I'm actually considering going with a coilover because after reading more information (including posts like this), a simple spring replacement is likely a poor choice for greatly improving the handling. Right now I've got my eyes set on KWs or those fancy new Ohlins. Expensive, sure, but so is getting new struts (~$2000-$3000) and a set of properly matched springs (~$400). If you're going to do something, might as well do it right. My only concern with coilovers is having to have them rebuilt. I don't mind doing something like this every 2-3 years but I don't want something that needs to be rebuilt every season.

I think some of you need to take a step back and re-read what Clint wrote...unless I read it wrong. :lol:
 
#34 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

I'd like to see more info on the Ohlins before I made a decision. After all the research we did on one of their setups for the GD, we are very skeptical.

As for the rear on the 08. I took a trip to Tennessee this past week to go to the mountains and drive the dragon some. i had the car loaded up with enough stuff that the static height dropped just about an inch all around. This was quickly followed by the car riding and handling like crap!!

The car was only an inch lower, but it was blatantly obvious that it was sitting on the bump stops at all times. The ride was rough and every little ripple in the road caused the rear end to go numb. Forget bumps mid corner...the hole rear end washed out and developed some wicked and random oversteer.

This goes along with the feeling I have had at autox or on track as well. When the rear gets loaded in a turn and is upset in any way it gets very light. Much opposite lock is sometimes needed to reign in the rear end and keep the car pointed in the correct direction.

Overall we feel the rear suspension is better in some ways than the old setup. There is SO much grip to be had in the rear now that the car is much faster when exiting corners as there is not nearly as much oversteer....unless there is a bump mid corner

Tony
 
#36 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

I'd like to see more info on the Ohlins before I made a decision. After all the research we did on one of their setups for the GD, we are very skeptical.

As for the rear on the 08. I took a trip to Tennessee this past week to go to the mountains and drive the dragon some. i had the car loaded up with enough stuff that the static height dropped just about an inch all around. This was quickly followed by the car riding and handling like crap!!

The car was only an inch lower, but it was blatantly obvious that it was sitting on the bump stops at all times. The ride was rough and every little ripple in the road caused the rear end to go numb. Forget bumps mid corner...the hole rear end washed out and developed some wicked and random oversteer.

Edit: another question, how stock in the suspension when you went to the dragon?

This goes along with the feeling I have had at autox or on track as well. When the rear gets loaded in a turn and is upset in any way it gets very light. Much opposite lock is sometimes needed to reign in the rear end and keep the car pointed in the correct direction.

Overall we feel the rear suspension is better in some ways than the old setup. There is SO much grip to be had in the rear now that the car is much faster when exiting corners as there is not nearly as much oversteer....unless there is a bump mid corner

Tony
How much weight would you say takes to do what you described? Also were you pushing the car while doing this? Did you try just lightly pushing the car with said weight and see if it causes the same problems? This could seriously be a problem if someone was carrying something heavy it randomly oversteers.

Edit: Another question, how stock was the suspension when you were randomly oversteering?
 
#41 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

Personally, I'm not too worried about tuning the car for spirited driving while heavily loaded with people and equipment and I'm sure that wasn't Subaru's goal or testing strategy either. The car is still perfectly safe driving around at legal speeds fully loaded - been there, done that, no issues.

I'm curious as to why we are concerned about driving a car spiritedly through the "twisties" with 3 passengers and expecting the chassis and suspension to be dialed in for that? When I'm whipping it around at a track it's usually just me or at most me and an instructor/passenger. I can tell you from personal experience that my '05 didn't like being loaded up with 3 male passengers (+450-500lbs) and a trunk load of equipment either (this was with stock springs and 24mm sways).

With that said, I'm very curious to hear more of Clint's thoughts on how to improve the handling of the car as it applies to track performance. I'd really like to hear some opinions as to why KW or other coilovers would be better than Ohlins. I thought Ohlins made some pretty good products? I know a guy at the track with a modded '04 and Ohlins struts and he loves them. I'd love to hear more.
 
#44 ·
Re: 2008 rear suspension - Clint's initial thoughts

Personally, I'm not too worried about tuning the car for spirited driving while heavily loaded with people and equipment and I'm sure that wasn't Subaru's goal or testing strategy either. The car is still perfectly safe driving around at legal speeds fully loaded - been there, done that, no issues.

I'm curious as to why we are concerned about driving a car spiritedly through the "twisties" with 3 passengers and expecting the chassis and suspension to be dialed in for that? When I'm whipping it around at a track it's usually just me or at most me and an instructor/passenger. I can tell you from personal experience that my '05 didn't like being loaded up with 3 male passengers (+450-500lbs) and a trunk load of equipment either (this was with stock springs and 24mm sways).

With that said, I'm very curious to hear more of Clint's thoughts on how to improve the handling of the car as it applies to track performance. I'd really like to hear some opinions as to why KW or other coilovers would be better than Ohlins. I thought Ohlins made some pretty good products? I know a guy at the track with a modded '04 and Ohlins struts and he loves them. I'd love to hear more.
I would agree and am not worried about cornering with 3 people or a heavy load. I am able to get the wicked oversteer with the car in track prep when autoxing or on track under the same conditions. It is the goal of the driver to driver quickly around a track. This involves keeping the car in control. It is the job of the engineer to help make the car controllable. We at TiC are acting as the engineers for the common folk. I just know that with the modeling we have put in and the parts we have on the way/are working on, this car can be amazing. It definitely is not currently although it's not half bad.

Tony