| STI Forum | Shop | Sponsors | Advertise | Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | ||
| Home | Register | Today's Posts | Go Premium | Mark Forums Read | Create a Member Journal | Vendor Deals | Member Classifieds |
| | #16 |
| Platinum Member Car: 2008 Forester Sports Fav Mod: "Proper" Break-in Location: LERSOC.com Posts: 3,951
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2004 Trader Rating: (4) | I've been modding my '05 for quite some time now. If you have a Q, I'd gladly give you my opinion over PM's. Check out my car page in the VB gallery. Cheers This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| all bOOst Car: 05 STi, 08 M3 (E92) Fav Mod: dual catch high performance pcv system Location: in front of you. ;) Posts: 1,314
IWSTI Addict since: Jun 2005 Trader Rating: (4) | Reading this might help. The "real" 3 stages (what works) you can substitue the Ecutek with your engine management of choice, i.e., UTEC, Cobb AP, Hydra, etc... |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Silver Member
Car: 05 & 09 WRB STI Location: Manchester, Maryland Posts: 2,270
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2005 Trader Rating: (4) | Now that I have data and experience to back this I will "chime in" on the intake. I installed an Injen CAI and TBE as my first mods to my 05 STI. I loved them! Sounded great no obvious problems. I now have a GP motto header and all my guages installed. I am not happy with what Im seeing from the wideband A/F though. I dont have any EM installed yet and my A/F is all over the place and seems to be a bit on the lean side. This is most likely from the intake. With the UTEC I can help this but be careful running our engines lean is not a good thing! |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Spec C Club Car: 06 Ford F150 Lariat Fav Mod: 4X4 Location: Nashville, TN Posts: 1,029
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2005 Trader Rating: (4) | Quote:
whats the difference between and avcr and perrin's ebcs? jason | |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Assistant to the Regional Manager
Car: 2005 Subaru WRX STi Fav Mod: Underglows Location: Tyler, Texas Posts: 8,833
IWSTI Addict since: Jul 2005 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Junior STI Driver Car: 05 Subaru WRX STi Fav Mod: Reflashed ECU/TBE/TD06 20G Location: Novato, CA near San Francisco Posts: 120
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2005 Trader Rating: (0) | Dear SVT - Interesting! The Mustang dyno used by Vishnu Performance Systems on my 'o5 STI showed about 270 whp and 280 wtq after having ECU reflashed and tuned and adding Perrin turboback exhaust system. I can't remember exact numbers, but these are close. I have stock fuel pump and no other mods, except short shifter kit. |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Moderator & ECU Tech
Car: 05 CGM STI Fav Mod: mo boostaz Location: Fredneck, MD Posts: 3,717
IWSTI Addict since: Jun 2004 Trader Rating: (6) | Quote:
HOWEVER, my recent tuning adventure shows that the EBCS is not worth the money on the stock turbo at all. Why? Everyone is comparing a tuned EBCS setup to a stock setup. You can't do this. It is apples to oranges. The only valid comparison is ...Tune the stock solenoid setup. Replace with the solenoid with the Perrin EBCS. Retune the exact same setup. I have done this. In my personal experiences tuning the stock solenoid and tuning the EBCS ... they both provide the same spool. Both setups gave me 19psi between 3100-3200 (no wastegate helper spring). I challenge ANYBODY to prove me wrong on this (and I mean anybody). This was on my car tuned by me with an APS TBE w/ cat and some stock airbox mods. Keep the stock solenoid. It performs remarkably well. I have also conversed with several very experienced and trusted tuners about this and they confirmed my thoughts. I still have the EBCS on my car ... but honestly, it was ~$90 that could have been spent better elsewhere. Is it a quality product? Heck yea. But, you have to put it in context. There is no point replacing the stock solenoid with the EBCS if you don't get a benefit from it. On a stock turbo you will NOT see an increase in spool if the tuner knows how to tune the stock solenoid. Both setups spool the same when tuned for it. However, the EBCS is extremely touchy and can spike easily. I can tune the spikes out one day ... and then they come back on another day when the weather changes. ... now, on a different turbo this all goes out the window. But, on a stock turbo, a Perrin EBCS just isn't necessary. Again, this assumes that both setups are tuned and the tuner knows how to tune a stock solenoid setup. t Last edited by WolfPlayer; 09-30-2005 at 10:40 AM. | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lurker Car: 05 Subaru WRX STi 311 HP 344 FTPT Fav Mod: Coming Soon Posts: 1
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2005 Trader Rating: (0) | i bought an 05 not too long ago. i got the APS cold air intake and a full APS exhaust without a cat. i got it tuned a new fuel oil pump put in at the shop when they tuned it and now im running 344 ft/lb torque. between 3k-5k rpm im running over 100ft/lb torque over a stock sti. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| STI Driver | Ha.... I read this thread and I immediately thought: - Whiteline F/R sways - STi Pink Springs - Front camber bolts. Heh... funny how different people interpret what the best 'performance' mods are for the money . I bet you with the 400 I spend with my money, I will be faster than anything else listed above 'on track' (with turns). ![]() - dow |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Professional STI Driver | Quote:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=826140 | |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Assistant to the Regional Manager
Car: 2005 Subaru WRX STi Fav Mod: Underglows Location: Tyler, Texas Posts: 8,833
IWSTI Addict since: Jul 2005 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
The only way a K&N drop-in would be worth it is if you plan on sticking with the stock air box for a long time and don't want to pay for air filters, but it will give you no performance benefit. | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| The Next Petter Solberg Car: 05 WRX STi Fav Mod: Seat Time Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 913
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2005 Trader Rating: (4) | Best Mods per $ R-Comps and Negative Camber $0.02 This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| |
| |