STI Forum  |  Shop  |  Sponsors  |  Advertise Rules  |  FAQ  |  Members List  |  Calendar
IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums
 
Home  |  Register  |  Today's Posts  |  Go Premium Mark Forums Read Create a Member Journal  |  Vendor Deals  |  Member Classifieds

New IWSTI license plate promotion!PLEASE VOTE/RESPOND TO THIS THREAD!Special Order 2008+ IWSTI Gear!

Welcome to IWSTI.com, the largest STI specific forum on the internet, where you can interact with other STI enthusiasts, create a member journal, and receive answers to your questions. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please register today to start enjoying IWSTI membership privileges! Problem registering? Please contact support.
Go Back   IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums > STi Technical Discussion > ECU Tuning & Performance Electronics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-09-2008, 03:58 PM   #31
Junior STI Driver
 
Car: WRB 04 WRX STi
Fav Mod: Coming Soon
Location: PA
Posts: 73
Join Date: Jun 2008
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Opensource tuning questions/opinions

1.5 was low at 2500 rpms starting point and scaled slowly as rpms increased
7.5 was highest reading at 6k rpms.

I just realized i dont have the definitions for Fine learning or Feeback knock. I only have Knock correction advance which is what i logged last night.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
IRTsti is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2008, 09:02 PM   #32
Grassroots STI Racer
 
Car: 04 Sti Wrb on Silver
Location: Hatillo, Puerto Rico
Posts: 501
Join Date: Jul 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Opensource tuning questions/opinions

If you downloaded Romraider then you have the most up to date def. You chose the Fine learning parameters when you are already reading form the ecu. Before that they wont appear in the screen. Really we cant tell you an exact number of what KC you should have because the KC map on the ecu is pretty much random numbers. Yo would need to flatten out the KC map in the high load points to see if you are knocking etc.
bluedemon_II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 10:05 AM   #33
OpenSourcerer
 
Fav Mod: ECU
Location: Austin
Posts: 799
Join Date: Apr 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Opensource tuning questions/opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpnorton View Post
You want to watch both.

FBKC is a timing retard in response to a "real time" knock event (e.g. the previous combustion cycle). It is a reactive knock suppression function.

FLKC is a stored parameter based on the presence of knock at similar load and RPM in the past. It is a preemptive knock suppression function.

They both can tell you where to make timing adjustments, however FBKC is a bit more precise for locating where knock occured (load & RPM) in that you see it in response to an actual event. That said FBKC can occasionally occur spuriously and/or result from a rapid change in load (shifting). FLKC is less precise for locating the point of onset (load & RPM) in that the FLKC table is coarser (fewer rows & columns) than the timing maps. However, the FLKC values will change over time and with finer precision so they can give insight into the intensity of the knock and are less likely to be spurious.

Keep in mind that FLKC and KBKC are additive.

How much correction were you seeing?
Not entirely correct.

FBKC = instaneous response to a knock event that just occurred. Example for a stock 07 STI is that the ECU pulls 1.4 degrees per knock event encountered. There is also a delay. So what you look for is increasingly large negative values:

EX of bad knock: -1.4, -2.8, -5.6, etc

EX of slight knock (one knock event ocurred): -1.4, -.7, -.35, 0, 0, etc

The same applies for FLKC, however FLKC can be positive and may have a starting learned value pulled (or added if IAM is not at 1). You must look at the trend and know what is in you FLKC table. Use Learningview tool to see this before you log.

FBKC and FLKC can both occur at the same time as well. Remember that FLKC is the trigger for the ECU to enter into rough correction (where a global IAM adjustment is made dependent upon knock occurring right then as all learned timing gets reset for a global correction: IAM is reset to it's intial value (0.5 for stock mapping) and it flip flops based on absence or presence of knock). Your IAM may do something like this:

IAM = 1. Knock makes FLKC go past -4 in a cell in the DA table that can trigger Rough Correction (IE: The DA cell has a 6 in it). IAM may do this:

Enter rough corretion-> FLKC table reset -> IAM reset -> IAM = 0.5 -> no knock -> FLKC grows to +4 -> IAM step value is .25 -> IAM = 0.75 ->FLKC table reset -> Car encounters knock -> FLKC goes to -4 (flip flop) -> IAM step value halved to 0.125 -> IAM = 0.625 -> FLKC table reset -> no knock -> FLKC grows to +4 (flip flop) -> IAM step value halved to 0.0625 -> IAM = 0.6875 -> FLKC table reset -> IAM stable, some positive and negative values of FLKC now should show up. Car runs smoothly.

RomRaider • View topic - Subaru's knock control strategy explained

The same example can be held for 16 bit ECUs, but your IAM is an integer value instead of a float (16 max, default starting 8, default step 4). There are still two times that the step value can get halved when in rough correction (during a flip flop).

I think it is imperative that people tuning a Subaru with the stock ECU understand how the levels of knock protection work and how final timing is derived.

Standalone knock control is much simpler.

Also, forget about Knock Correction. It is totally dependent upon several factors (the DA table value, IAM, FLKC and FBKC). I don't even log Knock Correction. Only FLKC, FBKC, IAM and total ign timing as far as timing goes.

Last edited by gabedude : 07-10-2008 at 10:11 AM.
gabedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 06:55 AM   #34
Grassroots STI Racer
 
Car: Blue 2006 WRX STi
Fav Mod: Protuned Stage 2
Location: Port Huron, Michigan
Posts: 547
Join Date: Mar 2008
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Opensource tuning questions/opinions

Sorry to thread jack, but how exactly do you scale your maf?
Maverick31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 07:11 AM   #35
Professional STI Driver
 
Car: 04 sti
Fav Mod: enginuity tuned
Location: NoVA
Posts: 417
Join Date: Aug 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to nhat
Default Re: Opensource tuning questions/opinions

there are a couple different ways...hop on over to romraider forums and read up!

RomRaider • View forum - Tuning Discussion
nhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 07:50 AM   #36
Grassroots STI Racer
 
Car: 04 Sti Wrb on Silver
Location: Hatillo, Puerto Rico
Posts: 501
Join Date: Jul 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Opensource tuning questions/opinions

Basically you look at AF learning and corrections and get them into a certain number by scaling the maf. Its something that will take a few tries but once you have mastered its pretty easy. Sometimes you could play with the injectors but that is not advised.
bluedemon_II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 07:59 AM   #37
Grassroots STI Racer
 
Car: Blue 2006 WRX STi
Fav Mod: Protuned Stage 2
Location: Port Huron, Michigan
Posts: 547
Join Date: Mar 2008
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Opensource tuning questions/opinions

Thanks guys, that helps.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
Maverick31 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed & Powered by Domain Architect