| STI Forum | Shop | Sponsors | Advertise | Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | ||
| Home | Register | Today's Posts | Go Premium | Mark Forums Read | Create a Member Journal | Vendor Deals | Member Classifieds |
| | #16 |
| S204 Racer Car: Solo II, WRC Location: Overland Park, KS Posts: 2,776
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2002 Trader Rating: (1) | Search for posts by a guy named Guru. He is running a Blitz SUS intake and has some nice gains from it using just a boost controller. That shows power IS available to FI cars without ECU work. That being said, back to the original question here...the K&N. A panel filter alone won't get you anything on our cars. Drop in vs. full intake change....difference. Why would the shape of the filter make any difference? Instead of that smaller area filter allowing that much dirt in, you're pulling over a larger surface area. Same media, oil...everything else. That isn't the only study I've seen with those kind of results either...but another test won't seem to change your mind. I'll remain skeptical. gforced said it...unless it's your own test/dyno/whatever, you never know the intent behind it. If I wanted to show a power loss with a filter, I could rig it.....and of course vice versa. This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Junior STI Driver | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| S204 Racer Car: Solo II, WRC Location: Overland Park, KS Posts: 2,776
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2002 Trader Rating: (1) | I click on that link and get nothing........and yeah, that is wierd...I thought they must have closed down the STi forum like they said they would. Where is the thread.....I'll look it up manually. This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| |
| |