STI Forum  |  Shop  |  Sponsors  |  Advertise Rules  |  FAQ  |  Members List  |  Calendar
IWSTI.com: Subaru WRX STI Forums
 
iwsti
Home  |  Register  |  Today's Posts  |  Go Premium Mark Forums Read Create a Member Journal  |  Vendor Deals  |  Member Classifieds
 
Register at IWSTI.com for FREE
Refer IWSTI.com to a friend
Go Back   IWSTI.com: Subaru WRX STI Forums > IWSTI Engine & Drivetrain > ECU Tuning & Performance Electronics > Cobb Street Tuner


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-25-2007, 06:08 AM   #1
Senior STI Driver
 
Car: 05 CGM FXT
Location: NY
Posts: 335
IWSTI Addict since: Feb 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Default Positive KC Tables, .88 DAM???

Through my two years of tuning my car I've had the DAM drop once when I was playing with the AVCS table. I've had the car not take full KC but it never dropped the DAM. Recently my car started adding positive knock correction values in to the knock learning table. I've never seen it have so many positive values. I thought this was a good thing. Last night I did a 4th gear pull on the highway and the car felt great. Boost control was very good, EGTs were good. I went home to check the knock learning table and found all positive values except for a -0.6 in the lower end of the load/rpm region. Knock light never flickered during the pull. I checked the DAM and was very surprised to find it at .88. I've had pulls where the knocklite flickered a few times and it never dropped the DAM. What gives?


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
ZuMBLe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 10:45 AM   #2
Spec C Club
 
Car: Slow 05 STi
Fav Mod: Loping Idle
Location: Chewy's Garage
Posts: 1,877
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2005
Trader Rating: (12)
Send a message via AIM to crystal_Imprezav
Default Re: Positive KC Tables, .88 DAM???

The IAM is controlled by a set of ranges in which it will be active or not. They are called rough correction ranges and are usually only active from something like 2000-5000rpms and something like 1-2.25 load iirc. My guess is that there is also a threshold where the bit is set or not from feedback by the knock sensor. If the bit is ever set in the range during those condition than your IAM will drop. It also has a set decrement in which it drops as well.
crystal_Imprezav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 01:22 PM   #3
Senior STI Driver
 
Car: 05 CGM FXT
Location: NY
Posts: 335
IWSTI Addict since: Feb 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Default Re: Positive KC Tables, .88 DAM???

So you're telling me I got knock in the lower range which caused this? I would say the upper load range of my tune is very stable. What I did do is do a 5psi pull through half the RPM range on my way home which I normally don't do. What puzzles me is that I never saw the knock light flicker and the KC values I was seeing in real time on my scanmaster3 looked good the whole time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
The IAM is controlled by a set of ranges in which it will be active or not. They are called rough correction ranges and are usually only active from something like 2000-5000rpms and something like 1-2.25 load iirc. My guess is that there is also a threshold where the bit is set or not from feedback by the knock sensor. If the bit is ever set in the range during those condition than your IAM will drop. It also has a set decrement in which it drops as well.
ZuMBLe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 01:52 PM   #4
Professional STI Racer
 
Fav Mod: Autotrader.com
Location: Philly
Posts: 822
IWSTI Addict since: Jan 2006
Trader Rating: (1)
Default Re: Positive KC Tables, .88 DAM???

I'm not exactly sure when the ECU decides to change the IAM, but just because you have positive KC values doesn't mean your car is happy. If your map calls for 10* and you are seeing 2*, that's probably bad. You probably know that already, but if not, it's something to consider.
waktasz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:14 PM   #5
OpenSourcerer
 
Fav Mod: ECU
Location: Austin
Posts: 845
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Positive KC Tables, .88 DAM???

Rouch correction range is pretty narrow (IDRC the FXT ranges). It is better to knock at low load, low RPM (less damage) and have a global adjustment that affects the upper RPM where more engine damage can occur if it knocks (high RPM, high load). I have seen the IAM drop on the 32 bit ECUs, it is normal. It is setup that way to protect your engine.
gabedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:59 PM   #6
Senior STI Driver
 
Car: 05 CGM FXT
Location: NY
Posts: 335
IWSTI Addict since: Feb 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Default Re: Positive KC Tables, .88 DAM???

Actually, I was seeing a KC of 8* through much of a RPM range out of a possible 9*but I found that 1 degree added to my KC table. So basically, it added 1 degree to KC and that resulted in the ECU not being able to take full dynamic advance. I didn't think it was such a big deal though. I've done multiple pulls where my KC was at 7 out of a possible 9 and the DAM didn't drop. Weird.

So the rough correction handles the + knock learning as well as the - knock learning. That's interesting info.

Maybe I need to bump the timing up 1 degree then reset the ECU so it doesn't have room to add the 1 degree so the KL will stay at 0?

Quote:
Originally Posted by waktasz
I'm not exactly sure when the ECU decides to change the IAM, but just because you have positive KC values doesn't mean your car is happy. If your map calls for 10* and you are seeing 2*, that's probably bad. You probably know that already, but if not, it's something to consider.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
ZuMBLe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


New To Site? Need Help? More

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed & Powered by Domain Architect