STI Forum  |  Shop  |  Sponsors  |  Advertise Rules  |  FAQ  |  Members List  |  Calendar
IWSTI.com: Subaru WRX STI Forums
 
iwsti
Home  |  Register  |  Today's Posts  |  Go Premium Mark Forums Read Create a Member Journal  |  Vendor Deals  |  Member Classifieds
 
Register at IWSTI.com for FREE
Refer IWSTI.com to a friend
Go Back   IWSTI.com: Subaru WRX STI Forums > IWSTI Engine & Drivetrain > ECU Tuning & Performance Electronics > Cobb Street Tuner


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2007, 02:55 PM   #196
The Next Petter Solberg
 
Car: 08 Z06 Corvette
Fav Mod: Jack Jack
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 882
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2005
Trader Rating: (3)
Default

A capacitor or resistor (or any steady state electronics) cannot create a "delay". They can only filter faster or slower transients.

I would not consider such a mod worthwile. The necessary delay will be relative to how fast the air is moving and where on spool-up it is. No simple electronics can do that for you. A microcontroller like a 68HC11 might offer what you want... but probably isnt worth the trouble.

Chris

Quote:
Originally Posted by daemon
I've thought about it. In the absolute simplest form, a resistor and a capacitor could be used to "smooth" out voltage transitions. However, I believe you'd actually only want to smooth out an increase in voltage and not a decrease (since when the throttle slams shut, it slams shut). For that, possibly add a diode to allow the voltage to bypass the resistor when discharging.

However, I'm not an electrical engineer either and there are a decent number of unknowns for me. I tried running a few numbers to see just how big a resistor and capacitor would need to be to get a ~100ms delay (a basic starting point), and the values seemed a bit higher than I would like. To use a small resistor so as to not effect the amount of current in the circuit would force us to use a pretty darn big capacitor. To get the capacitor to a reasonable size would require a large resistor (not physically large, but large enough in value to possibly hose the current levels). Of course, I could have gotten the numbers all wrong.

Either way, the circuit is a simple one, so it might be "fun" to just throw on some components and hope I don't fry anything important. Actually, frying wouldn't be likely IMHO, for whatever that is worth.

And, fwiw, a capacitor's charge time is not a linear slope. The proper solution might be a microcontroller with an onboard ADC/DAC and then just write a mini-program to translate and delay as needed.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 03:05 PM   #197
The Next Petter Solberg
 
Car: 2004 STi
Location: Florida
Posts: 894
IWSTI Addict since: Feb 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker
A capacitor or resistor (or any steady state electronics) cannot create a "delay". They can only filter faster or slower transients.
Notice I used the word "smooth".
daemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:48 AM   #198
STI Driver
 
Car: 03 mbp gga
Fav Mod: 12.9 / 105+
Location: lincoln, ri, usa
Posts: 237
IWSTI Addict since: Dec 2005
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to ride5000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker
A capacitor or resistor (or any steady state electronics) cannot create a "delay". They can only filter faster or slower transients.
not necessarily true.

all reactive circuits create some amount of phase shift.

depending on the input this may or may not result in a signal "delay."
ride5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 04:29 PM   #199
The Next Petter Solberg
 
Car: 08 Z06 Corvette
Fav Mod: Jack Jack
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 882
IWSTI Addict since: Oct 2005
Trader Rating: (3)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ride5000
not necessarily true.

all reactive circuits create some amount of phase shift.

depending on the input this may or may not result in a signal "delay."
Awwwww... that was not fair. True, but a phase shift means a fraction of a wavelength in time... not enough to spool a turbo
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 06:22 AM   #200
STI Driver
 
Car: 03 mbp gga
Fav Mod: 12.9 / 105+
Location: lincoln, ri, usa
Posts: 237
IWSTI Addict since: Dec 2005
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to ride5000
Default

i do agree that trying to achieve what is proposed is impossible with LRC circuits.

i'm starting to think that there may be a "delay" register buried somewhere in the ecu code that is based on intake tract volume between the mafs and the combustion chambers.

ken
ride5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 07:23 AM   #201
Professional STI Racer
 
Posts: 599
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ride5000


i'm starting to think that there may be a "delay" register buried somewhere in the ecu code that is based on intake tract volume between the mafs and the combustion chambers.

ken
My thoughs exactly.
I have tuned a blowthrough and have read about other people with a blowthrough. The rich dip is not there when using the blowthrough setup. IMO it is a delay between when the MAF reads the airflow and when the airflow reaches the motor.

TMS
TheMadScientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 04:57 PM   #202
Spec C Club
 
Car: Slow 05 STi
Fav Mod: Loping Idle
Location: Chewy's Garage
Posts: 1,877
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2005
Trader Rating: (12)
Send a message via AIM to crystal_Imprezav
Default

Hmm interesting find...
http://www.maftpro.com/tproinfo.shtml
crystal_Imprezav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 05:11 PM   #203
The Next Petter Solberg
 
Car: 2004 STi
Location: Florida
Posts: 894
IWSTI Addict since: Feb 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
Post #101.
daemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 03:37 AM   #204
Professional STI Racer
 
Posts: 599
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
And for the price you would be better off with a used Utec.

$399 for the control box
$12 for the IAT
$69 fot the 3bar MAP
$22 for the IAT harness
$24 for the universal harness

Comes to ~$530 + shipping.

TMS
TheMadScientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 04:16 PM   #205
Senior STI Driver
 
Car: '05 STi
Fav Mod: Cusco Zero 2R's
Posts: 335
IWSTI Addict since: Jun 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Interesting AFR plot on post #1, third chart down. Also read post #50.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1195987
04stiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 11:02 PM   #206
Spec C Club
 
Car: Slow 05 STi
Fav Mod: Loping Idle
Location: Chewy's Garage
Posts: 1,877
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2005
Trader Rating: (12)
Send a message via AIM to crystal_Imprezav
Default

Shocker, I am working on a solution, turning my trades to reverse engineering...
crystal_Imprezav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 11:12 AM   #207
Super Moderator
 
Car: 05 Ram 3500 CTD
Fav Mod: Majin
Posts: 14,989
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2006
Trader Rating: (9)
Default

Reverse engineering FTMFW!!! I hope you are successful!

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
Shocker, I am working on a solution, turning my trades to reverse engineering...
lackskill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 11:55 PM   #208
Senior STI Driver
 
Car: '05 STi
Fav Mod: Cusco Zero 2R's
Posts: 335
IWSTI Addict since: Jun 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Minor update. Switched to a blow-thru tonight. Intial drive shows promise. Very smooth. No change in tune intially, and it drives great. I will log stuff in the next few days.
04stiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 08:00 AM   #209
Spec C Club
 
Car: Slow 05 STi
Fav Mod: Loping Idle
Location: Chewy's Garage
Posts: 1,877
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2005
Trader Rating: (12)
Send a message via AIM to crystal_Imprezav
Default

^ Going the same route.
crystal_Imprezav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 08:14 AM   #210
Super Moderator
 
Car: 05 Ram 3500 CTD
Fav Mod: Majin
Posts: 14,989
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2006
Trader Rating: (9)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
^ Going the same route.


What happened to the reverse engineering???


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
lackskill is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


New To Site? Need Help? More

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed & Powered by Domain Architect