STI Forum  |  Shop  |  Sponsors  |  Advertise Rules  |  FAQ  |  Members List  |  Calendar
IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums
 
Home  |  Register  |  Today's Posts  |  Go Premium Mark Forums Read Create a Member Journal  |  Vendor Deals  |  Member Classifieds

New IWSTI license plate promotion!PLEASE VOTE/RESPOND TO THIS THREAD!Special Order 2008+ IWSTI Gear!

Welcome to IWSTI.com, the largest STI specific forum on the internet, where you can interact with other STI enthusiasts, create a member journal, and receive answers to your questions. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please register today to start enjoying IWSTI membership privileges! Problem registering? Please contact support.
Go Back   IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums > STi Technical Discussion > ECU Tuning & Performance Electronics > Cobb Street Tuner


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-15-2006, 12:41 PM   #31
The Next Petter Solberg
 
Car: 08 Z06 Corvette
Fav Mod: Jack Jack
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 883
Join Date: Oct 2005
Trader Rating: (3)
Default

I am continuing to also have a hard time with this. Im working out that the tip-in enrichment gets laid over the fuel that the MAF commands. Because I have a blow-through MAF, the MAF commands a much quicker response that doesnt require much, if any, "catching up". My current issue is that I think my PCM still expects the pull-through MAF dynamics on which to lay the added enrichment. Because over time, my MAF behaves differently, I can get tip in right, say, the first few thenths of a second after throttle change, but then it does something different. This is becoming frustrating, and Im worried that there is no current solution for it outside of finding some really interesting tables with the Tactrix cable/OpenECU stuff.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2006, 07:45 PM   #32
Moderator & ECU Tech
 
Fav Mod: mo boostaz
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 3,646
Join Date: Jun 2004
Trader Rating: (6)
Default

I guarantee that there are quite a few tables for tip-in. My 1990 IROC had 8 tables and 2 constants for controlling tip-in. No freaking way that this scooby only has one If you use XMLWRITE and generate a XML file for every table (including unknown tables) then it becomes clear just how much we don't know. I think there are approximately 500 tables in the calibration (give or take). Granted, some of those will be automatic vs. manual (even though we only have manuals).

It sounds like you need access to what I originally wanted (and still want). The decay tables/factors, etc. We need the ability to control tip-in time.

t
WolfPlayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 08:44 AM   #33
The Next Petter Solberg
 
Car: 08 Z06 Corvette
Fav Mod: Jack Jack
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 883
Join Date: Oct 2005
Trader Rating: (3)
Default

I've been staring at this a little more.

my car spikes rich then swings lean. This isnt too surprising given that I have a blowthrough and the car should jump to the MAF fueling much more quickly. What Im having an issue with is the swing lean. I can't seem to kill it.

Are we assuming that the PCM "climbs" the Tip-in enrichment table in real time? If it swings rich then goes lean, can we consider that this might be that the low values are rich enough, but the upper values are too lean?

The rest of my tune seems great, but I just CANNOT get this tip-in ironed out, and its beginning to really frustrate me, given that theres a 20 minute time to upload new base-map numbers.

Chris
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 08:50 AM   #34
Moderator & ECU Tech
 
Fav Mod: mo boostaz
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 3,646
Join Date: Jun 2004
Trader Rating: (6)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker
I've been staring at this a little more.

my car spikes rich then swings lean. This isnt too surprising given that I have a blowthrough and the car should jump to the MAF fueling much more quickly. What Im having an issue with is the swing lean. I can't seem to kill it.

Are we assuming that the PCM "climbs" the Tip-in enrichment table in real time? If it swings rich then goes lean, can we consider that this might be that the low values are rich enough, but the upper values are too lean?

The rest of my tune seems great, but I just CANNOT get this tip-in ironed out, and its beginning to really frustrate me, given that theres a 20 minute time to upload new base-map numbers.

Chris
Chris,

I rarely if ever recommend this but Tactrix + OpenECU stuff is going to help you here. First, we're talking 30s for the flash. Second, there's a new table out there for you to play with (tip in vs. coolant temp). Once AP v2.0 is available then this all becomes irrelevant but if you need it ironed out NOW then you need to take a look at what I mentioned.

Regarding tip-in, I think we need to rescale. I think that rescaling will help dramatically in determining what cells we need to modify. There just isn't much resolution. So, to be short - you recommended rescaling and I think you need to do it

I think that you probably just simply hit a point that is too rich and then the STFT pulled it back. You are experiencing what I originally had. Now mine is slightly on the other side ... mine spikes slightly lean and the STFT richens it up. Resolution is what we need here, IMHO.

t
WolfPlayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 10:38 AM   #35
The Next Petter Solberg
 
Car: 08 Z06 Corvette
Fav Mod: Jack Jack
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 883
Join Date: Oct 2005
Trader Rating: (3)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfPlayer
Chris,

I rarely if ever recommend this but Tactrix + OpenECU stuff is going to help you here. First, we're talking 30s for the flash. Second, there's a new table out there for you to play with (tip in vs. coolant temp). Once AP v2.0 is available then this all becomes irrelevant but if you need it ironed out NOW then you need to take a look at what I mentioned.

Regarding tip-in, I think we need to rescale. I think that rescaling will help dramatically in determining what cells we need to modify. There just isn't much resolution. So, to be short - you recommended rescaling and I think you need to do it

I think that you probably just simply hit a point that is too rich and then the STFT pulled it back. You are experiencing what I originally had. Now mine is slightly on the other side ... mine spikes slightly lean and the STFT richens it up. Resolution is what we need here, IMHO.

t
Yeah... I still need the Tactrix thing. Scares me though... this whole OpenECU thing

I have totally rescaled the table... so I have the flexibility to do what i need to.

I'll try the basic test of just leaning it up a little to see if the lean swing is the STFTs. If thats the case, I'll be impressed that they are that quick!

Thanks Tim.
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 01:36 PM   #36
Grassroots STI Racer
 
Car: 05 Subaru WRX STi
Fav Mod: Cobb StreetTUNER
Location: Elk Grove, CA USA
Posts: 592
Join Date: Jul 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

You guys get any further with this?

I'm forcing myself to finally get this stuff done ever since I put the PE850s in last spring. I'll start a new thread about why.
R4ND0M_AX3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 04:43 PM   #37
Moderator & ECU Tech
 
Fav Mod: mo boostaz
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 3,646
Join Date: Jun 2004
Trader Rating: (6)
Default

I am! I rescaled this map I'll post more when I am sure.

t
WolfPlayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 07:06 AM   #38
Spec C Club
 
Car: Slow 05 STi
Fav Mod: Loping Idle
Location: Chewy's Garage
Posts: 1,864
Join Date: Mar 2005
Trader Rating: (11)
Send a message via AIM to crystal_Imprezav
Default

This is why I don't ever want to buy injectors! Tuning the tip-in would probably drive me insane especially since it is a basemap parameter.
crystal_Imprezav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 12:29 PM   #39
Moderator & ECU Tech
 
Fav Mod: mo boostaz
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 3,646
Join Date: Jun 2004
Trader Rating: (6)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
This is why I don't ever want to buy injectors! Tuning the tip-in would probably drive me insane especially since it is a basemap parameter.
Honestly, it really isn't that bad. The car drives great. It's just the data that is annoying. However, if you drove my car you would never know the data was a little weird.

t
WolfPlayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 06:33 PM   #40
Spec C Club
 
Car: Slow 05 STi
Fav Mod: Loping Idle
Location: Chewy's Garage
Posts: 1,864
Join Date: Mar 2005
Trader Rating: (11)
Send a message via AIM to crystal_Imprezav
Default

Wolf I just ordered my FMIC. Have you installed yours yet? Hopefully it will be here next week and I can do the install and tune in No. VA and we can compare notes.
crystal_Imprezav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2006, 05:00 AM   #41
Moderator & ECU Tech
 
Fav Mod: mo boostaz
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 3,646
Join Date: Jun 2004
Trader Rating: (6)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
Wolf I just ordered my FMIC. Have you installed yours yet? Hopefully it will be here next week and I can do the install and tune in No. VA and we can compare notes.
Nope. Dude - I soooo hibernate in the winter. Winter is when I collect mods and then I install them in the spring. Lots of parts hanging around my house now ...

1) APS DR525 (+ cool tube cover and t-bolts)
2) TGV deletes
3) APS Inlet Pipe
4) APS Fuel Rails (that's right baby! - rofl)
5) NextGear Thermoshield intake gaskets

I'm also trying to aquire a spare STI intake manifold/TB for porting and an aeromotive fuel pressure regulator. Ultimately, I would like to assemble a full setup (ported intake manifold, ported TB, APS rails, TGV Deletes, gaskets, etc.). It would be nice to unbolt my full stock piece and then bolt on the new setup (and not have to chop off the fuel pressure regulator, etc).

If you are doing the install in Northern VA - please let me know. That's only like 1.5hr drive for me. I'd come down and help out with the install (as long as there is some heat somewhere because I'm such a pu55y in the cold).

t
WolfPlayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2006, 05:57 AM   #42
Spec C Club
 
Car: Slow 05 STi
Fav Mod: Loping Idle
Location: Chewy's Garage
Posts: 1,864
Join Date: Mar 2005
Trader Rating: (11)
Send a message via AIM to crystal_Imprezav
Default

Will do, ive been trying to get my hands on a used set of tgv so I can get then deleted w/o the downtime. Im also p&p my stock exhaust manifolds sometime soon and getting them coated. APS inlet on the way as well haha seems like we have a lot in common. I also just bid on a used intake manifold yesterday on ebay for like $75. Im also looking into a JDM manifold so that I can eliminate the need to the TGV's and also go top feed injectors. Ill let you know when I get to the FMIC install. Shouldn't be too bad, and I doubt I am going to even need any tuning on it.
crystal_Imprezav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2006, 07:35 AM   #43
Grassroots STI Racer
 
Car: 05 Subaru WRX STi
Fav Mod: Cobb StreetTUNER
Location: Elk Grove, CA USA
Posts: 592
Join Date: Jul 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfPlayer
I'm also trying to aquire a spare STI intake manifold/TB for porting and an aeromotive fuel pressure regulator. Ultimately, I would like to assemble a full setup (ported intake manifold, ported TB, APS rails, TGV Deletes, gaskets, etc.). It would be nice to unbolt my full stock piece and then bolt on the new setup (and not have to chop off the fuel pressure regulator, etc).

t
After you have APS fuel rails you can do things a little different. The TGVs can stay on the heads while you take off the manifold. In fact you have to do it that way because of the fuel line routing. It makes things a little easier not having to deal with all of that weight when you're trying to line things up.

Spend some time on the routing of the new fuel lines and breather tubes from the turbo inlet kit. It's a tight fit with everything near the throttle body area.
R4ND0M_AX3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006, 11:06 AM   #44
Moderator & ECU Tech
 
Fav Mod: mo boostaz
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 3,646
Join Date: Jun 2004
Trader Rating: (6)
Default

Ummm - it's nice weather I started the install of my FMIC. Everything is mounted. I just need to cut the cover and the splash gaurds (and mount my dual I/C sprayer ). So far, I have about 9 hours into this install.

t
WolfPlayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006, 11:27 AM   #45
Professional STI Racer
 
Car: 05 CGM STI
Fav Mod: protune-Agile 322.2whp 370.3
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 661
Join Date: Aug 2006
Trader Rating: (3)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfPlayer
Ummm - it's nice weather I started the install of my FMIC. Everything is mounted. I just need to cut the cover and the splash gaurds (and mount my dual I/C sprayer ). So far, I have about 9 hours into this install.

t
Hey wolf iam going to be doing this install soon myself what do you think about giving a local guy a hand?


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
LogicalXtremes is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed & Powered by Domain Architect