| STI Forum | Shop | Sponsors | Advertise | Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | ||
| Home | Register | Today's Posts | Go Premium | Mark Forums Read | Create a Member Journal | Vendor Deals | Member Classifieds |
| | #1 |
| Silver Member Car: 2005 STI Fav Mod: Shawn's brain Location: Southwest Michigan Posts: 418
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2004 Trader Rating: (0) | I am trying to tune my 05 STi with StreetTUNER and I just hit a roadblock with the intake calibration table. This table will not accept more than 500 gps values... I am running an FP Red and a RAW build engine. At 21psi I am hitting 458 gps at 4.54 volts (KS Tech 83mm intake). I want more headroom so I can run race fuel and turn up the boost... My specific question: How can I unlock StreetTUNER to accept values greater than 500 gps? Thanks, Jeff B This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Authorized Vendor Car: 06 STI Location: California Bay Area Posts: 293
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2006 Trader Rating: (0) | You can't. That's an internal ECU cap on that value. There's a workaround for this, however. Hit me up and can point you in the right direction. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Spec C Club
Car: Blue 05 STI Fav Mod: 4th gear wheelspin Location: Upstate NY Posts: 2,091
IWSTI Addict since: Nov 2004 Trader Rating: (0) | 300g/s workaround - 'hacked' MAF up to 600g/sec or 1200g/sec - NASIOC I have actually seen one well-known tuner hack up their maps with this methodology, presumably just to make it harder to copy the map onto other cars. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Tangent | I believe Jorge from P&L Motorsports offers his intake calibrations to the public. Myabe you can use this for a base. P&L Motorsports - Downloads |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Junior STI Driver | Quote:
The link that was posted refers to the limitation of the 16-bit ECU (ex. 02-05 WRX) which cannot represent airflow greater than 300 g/s (except for select JDM ECUs). This does not apply to the vehicle in question. | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Silver Member Car: 2005 STI Fav Mod: Shawn's brain Location: Southwest Michigan Posts: 418
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2004 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
Good lead... thanks Jeff B | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Junior STI Driver | I guess you ignored my post. Ed's statement is false. You can tune with RomRaider/Ecuflash and enter any value you want for maf scaling for your ECU. Using the airflow hack in the link mentioned is completely unnecessary and a bad idea, but I guess might be your only option if you ECU is locked due to a ver. 2 AP (I would at least report the issue to Cobb so they can fix it). If you have a ver. 1 AP, then I would suggest you pick up a tactrix table and modify maf scaling with RomRaider/Ecuflash even if you are going to continue to use ST. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Silver Member Car: 2005 STI Fav Mod: Shawn's brain Location: Southwest Michigan Posts: 418
IWSTI Addict since: Aug 2004 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Authorized Vendor Car: 06 STI Location: California Bay Area Posts: 293
IWSTI Addict since: Apr 2006 Trader Rating: (0) | Quote:
Thanks -- Ed | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Junior STI Driver | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Authorized Vendor Car: Subaru STI Fav Mod: Tuning Location: Franklin Park, IL Posts: 341
IWSTI Addict since: Mar 2006 Trader Rating: (0) | Maybe this is a limitation on Cobb's part.. maybe it isn't. But, I'll add this. Yes, you can raise the AccessTuner vaule above 360g/s, but all the testing I've done showed that at 360g/s you hit a brick wall and simply stop registering above that point. FWIW -Jorge |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Junior STI Driver | Quote:
Cobb undoubtedly knows this, so it is either a bug in their software that they are not aware of, or they deliberately did this for whatever reason. | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Senior STI Driver | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Spec C Club Car: 2007 STI Fav Mod: Perrin GT30R Location: Olathe, KS Posts: 1,344
IWSTI Addict since: Jan 2005 Trader Rating: (0) | I know the ecu values are capable of over 500 g/s but like they said do they understand what to do after an assumed "cap" Quote:
Brick wall? i dont understand, the vehicle goes lean im guessing? I haven't had any issues as all my GT30R cars dip easily into the mid 400s', plus i dont like using the primary fuel tables to remove or add a substantial amount of fuel, i would rather set it at actual Air/fuel desired and have the car perform to what i indicated, thats just the way I learned.. that way load, maf, and fuel all agree with logs. Also cutting the scaling in half isn't really anything I would do just because then load tables do not agree either, kind of a last resort. I would suggest to Queef to go blow through meter. This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad. Last edited by 12SecSTI; 10-10-2008 at 01:43 PM. | |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| New To Site? | Need Help? | More |