STI Forum  |  Shop  |  Sponsors  |  Advertise Rules  |  FAQ  |  Members List  |  Calendar
IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums
 
Home  |  Register  |  Today's Posts  |  Go Premium Mark Forums Read Create a Member Journal  |  Vendor Deals  |  Member Classifieds

New IWSTI license plate promotion!PLEASE VOTE/RESPOND TO THIS THREAD!Special Order 2008+ IWSTI Gear!

Welcome to IWSTI.com, the largest STI specific forum on the internet, where you can interact with other STI enthusiasts, create a member journal, and receive answers to your questions. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please register today to start enjoying IWSTI membership privileges! Problem registering? Please contact support.
Go Back   IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums > STi Technical Discussion > Engine, Power, & Performance > Built Motor Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2007, 06:47 PM   #16
Spec C Club
 
Fav Mod: when it's not blown up
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,566
Join Date: Nov 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by all4bspinnin
gotcha, now what kind of displacement increase is a 100mm bore? I plan on doing this...

deburred/shimmed crank (like u said), forged pistons and rods, ARP headstuds... who makes a goodrod bearing? Anything else i should be considering? So dont worry about sleeves since im shooting for around 400-450whp?

i can get rods and pistons at cost price since a good friend of the family works for a major performance distributor. Due to the "hookups" i have im pretty sure i'll be able to put this block together for less than 2500
100mm bore is a 25cc increase, you go from 2457 to 2482cc, plus or minus.

If you are looking to rev to 7500-8000 and make any power up there, you'll need to invest in head work, which could be more expensive than the stroker crank.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
jays05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 07:23 PM   #17
Spec C Club
 
Car: 06 BLACK STI!!!
Fav Mod: road head!
Location: jax, FL
Posts: 1,276
Join Date: Jul 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to all4bspinnin
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jays05
100mm bore is a 25cc increase, you go from 2457 to 2482cc, plus or minus.

If you are looking to rev to 7500-8000 and make any power up there, you'll need to invest in head work, which could be more expensive than the stroker crank.
so a bit of portwork and aftermarket valvetrain?
all4bspinnin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 09:03 PM   #18
520
STi > EVO... Wait what???
 
Car: 03 EVO
Fav Mod: stock :(
Location: Michigan / Saint Louis
Posts: 12,397
Join Date: Oct 2005
Trader Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to 520
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

yah youll need a valvejob and upgraded valvetrain.

clevite makes good bearings.
520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 05:27 AM   #19
Spec C Club
 
Fav Mod: when it's not blown up
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,566
Join Date: Nov 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Clevite changed their rod bearings recently... Ron @ Axis stopped using them from what I read.

My head setup (in sig) worked out to be a bit less than $3k all said and done. Lots of fun, but total overkill for a 400-500whp setup. In retrospect, I miss the massive torque spike @ 5k that the stock cams gave.
jays05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 08:12 AM   #20
Spec C Club
 
Car: 06 BLACK STI!!!
Fav Mod: road head!
Location: jax, FL
Posts: 1,276
Join Date: Jul 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to all4bspinnin
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jays05
Clevite changed their rod bearings recently... Ron @ Axis stopped using them from what I read.

My head setup (in sig) worked out to be a bit less than $3k all said and done. Lots of fun, but total overkill for a 400-500whp setup. In retrospect, I miss the massive torque spike @ 5k that the stock cams gave.
looks like a pretty mean setup... does anyone else make rod bearings? I think im going to stick with the stock cams... they seem to have the best midrange, or should i go with a cam that has a little more top end... personally, i love the midrange


Here's another question... what would happen if i had that built motor installed but was running a vf39 for a month or two... mega instant spool?
all4bspinnin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 08:49 AM   #21
S204 Racer
 
Posts: 3,002
Join Date: Apr 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jays05
My head setup (in sig) worked out to be a bit less than $3k all said and done. Lots of fun, but total overkill for a 400-500whp setup. In retrospect, I miss the massive torque spike @ 5k that the stock cams gave.
I wish more people would see this and think about it. All you need [and really want] at that power level is the right turbo, supporting parts and tune. Period.
Flycaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 03:19 PM   #22
Spec C Club
 
Car: 06 BLACK STI!!!
Fav Mod: road head!
Location: jax, FL
Posts: 1,276
Join Date: Jul 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to all4bspinnin
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

i guess the first step is to get my hands on a cheap EJ257 block
all4bspinnin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 07:13 AM   #23
Professional STI Driver
 
Car: 2006 Corvette Z-51
Fav Mod: Buying a new car.
Location: All around the US
Posts: 426
Join Date: Mar 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to PowerLabs Send a message via AIM to PowerLabs Send a message via MSN to PowerLabs Send a message via Yahoo to PowerLabs
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
As for bore. If your going to use a new block casting stick with the stock bore of 99.5. The stock bore and hone that comes from the factory will be better than any machine shop can produce. If rebuilding a used block, go with 100 overbore and make sure they are using torque plates on the bore/hone.
Absolutely NOT true.
The stock bore has such low tolerances that Subaru produces TWO pistons for the same engine, to accomodate that.
I bought one subaru STI shortblock that had 3 regular size pistons and one slight oversize one. NEW, FROM THE FACTORY.

Perfectly fine for a street car, which is what STIs are, but don't think for one second that this is about as good as it gets. STIs are mass produced in large numbers as cheaply as possible just like any other factory car. Any machine shop should be able to do *much* better.

And, as was mentioned before, 99%+ of built motors out there run a stock crank. Crawford has spun bone stock engines to 8K with a GT35R attached to it; power drops off dramatically after 7.7K even with a big turbo, but other than that they ran fine. The current power record on a stock block is also well over 600 to the wheels; its all in the tune.
PowerLabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 07:23 AM   #24
Professional STI Driver
 
Car: 2006 Corvette Z-51
Fav Mod: Buying a new car.
Location: All around the US
Posts: 426
Join Date: Mar 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to PowerLabs Send a message via AIM to PowerLabs Send a message via MSN to PowerLabs Send a message via Yahoo to PowerLabs
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by all4bspinnin
looks like a pretty mean setup... does anyone else make rod bearings? I think im going to stick with the stock cams... they seem to have the best midrange, or should i go with a cam that has a little more top end... personally, i love the midrange


Here's another question... what would happen if i had that built motor installed but was running a vf39 for a month or two... mega instant spool?

Built motors make absolutely zero power more than a stock motor. A 10thousand dollar sleeved, fully forged, counter balanced, nitrided, extra oiling holes, etc etc shortblock will make the same power your factory block makes, but burn more oil and be noisier (particularly at startup when the forged pistons are cold and haven't expanded yet).
ALSO, faced with severe detonation, that fully built 10thousand dollar engine block will be completely destroyed in much the same fashion as a factory engine.

The point of a built motor is that it will withstand more power, more reliably. Forged pistons will take a little bit of det before they go, and other forged components will take higher power levels without breaking, but the power does NOT come from building the engine, it comes from what is attached to it and how it is tuned, and similarly, reliability will only come from an engine that is tuned properly and does not detonate.

Now, answering your question, Calico, Clevite, and Cosworth all make race bearings. My forged motor ran:
Calico Bearings: These are steel, moly coated. There is a thread on NASIOC where a WRX drag car lost the wastegate hose, boost spiked well in the high 30s, low 40s of PSI, detonated the pistons and rods into small pieces, and when it was taken apart, the bearings were in perfect condition. These are the ones to get, in my opinion.
ARP Head Studs: 180thousand PSI tensile strength cro-moly steel. The best there are.
Wiseco Forged Pistons: Lightest forged pistons out there.
Factory STI head Gaskets: 3-Layer Stainless steel; Crawford uses them on 700+HP builds.
Shimmed oil pump: Bumped up my oil pressure about 15-20PSI higher.
Power Enterprises Kevlar Timing belt: I had a belt go lose before, so didn't want to take chances this time.

It ran great; 8100RPM redline at 20PSI boost. Then I did a top speed run on the car, hit 177MPH, saw 1680F EGTs and melted piston number 1 right off. The engine was completely destroyed. All the best parts in the world still won't help a crappy tune or an unforseen event

As far as the heads, again, Crawford states that they run bone stock blocks to 8K. They told me that at 7.7K there is a large drop in the powerband that mostly goes alway when the valvesprings are shimmed, making them assume that this is caused by the onset of valve float.
My next engine will be similar to my last one:
ARP head studs, Calico race bearings, Forged Pistons (probably Wiseco again), Stock gaskets, Kevlar Timing Belt (Prob. Power Enterprises again), and, this time, stiffer valve springs. The springs alone will prevent valve float. Your cams and heads won't allow much power to be made at high revs, but with a big enough turbo you can benefit from a higher redline.

Last edited by PowerLabs : 08-07-2007 at 07:27 AM.
PowerLabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 07:35 AM   #25
Spec C Club
 
Car: Slow 05 STi
Fav Mod: Loping Idle
Location: Chewy's Garage
Posts: 1,861
Join Date: Mar 2005
Trader Rating: (11)
Send a message via AIM to crystal_Imprezav
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

The whole point of buying a new block is to know the exact bore size of the casting. As I thought most would know it is a common knowledge that if stuffing forged pistons into a new casting, you are suppose to take a look at the 'A' or 'B' markings on the pistons in the block. With those specs, you can easily call up you desired piston manufactorers and give them those numbers and have them send you the correct parts for you application. Again, still going to be a way more precise bore/hone than any shop can do.
crystal_Imprezav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 07:58 AM   #26
Spec C Club
 
Car: 06 BLACK STI!!!
Fav Mod: road head!
Location: jax, FL
Posts: 1,276
Join Date: Jul 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to all4bspinnin
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by crystal_Imprezav
The whole point of buying a new block is to know the exact bore size of the casting. As I thought most would know it is a common knowledge that if stuffing forged pistons into a new casting, you are suppose to take a look at the 'A' or 'B' markings on the pistons in the block. With those specs, you can easily call up you desired piston manufactorers and give them those numbers and have them send you the correct parts for you application. Again, still going to be a way more precise bore/hone than any shop can do.
So your saying, i'll have to have pistons custom made for the build? I cant buy some premade to a specifc bore piston?
all4bspinnin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 08:30 AM   #27
Spec C Club
 
Fav Mod: CP35r 440whp
Posts: 1,909
Join Date: Jun 2006
Trader Rating: (3)
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Powerlabs has some Great points and I agree with most of it.

I do believe that the factory can bore/hone an engine better than any aftermaket machinist can. this is because the factory uses much better tooling. that's usually the bottom line.
modaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 10:06 AM   #28
Spec C Club
 
Car: 06 BLACK STI!!!
Fav Mod: road head!
Location: jax, FL
Posts: 1,276
Join Date: Jul 2006
Trader Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to all4bspinnin
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

i agree to, however since we arent going have the hookups with Fuji Heavy Industries... can we just have the block honed/sleeved... that would work fine for my goal..?
all4bspinnin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 10:18 AM   #29
GT R US
 
Fav Mod: $20. mudflaps from auto zone
Location: my cave
Posts: 5,831
Join Date: Dec 2003
Trader Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Neanderthal Racing
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerLabs
Absolutely NOT true.
The stock bore has such low tolerances that Subaru produces TWO pistons for the same engine, to accomodate that.
this is very interesting as i have never heard that before. while i'm done with all controversy with respect to my former shortblock, if true, this would explain a lot.

as far as the rest of the discussion goes, i have a stock crank in my cobb pro stage1 "big bore" 2.6L motor. do i look worried? (isfh)
Neanderthal Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 10:58 AM   #30
S204 Racer
 
Posts: 3,002
Join Date: Apr 2004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: Anyone have a built motor using the stock STi crankshaft?

Yep, the "A" and "B" cylinder sizes are true - you can see the markings right on the block. Subaru shoots for a .0004", with a supposed accepted tolerance of .0000" to .0009". The reason for this discrepancy is tool wear.

IMO, if you measure each cylinder and match the larger pistons to the larger bores, you're gonna be close enough since every piston has slight variations too.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
Flycaster is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed & Powered by Domain Architect