STI Forum  |  Shop  |  Sponsors  |  Advertise Rules  |  FAQ  |  Members List  |  Calendar
IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums
 
Home  |  Register  |  Today's Posts  |  Go Premium Mark Forums Read Create a Member Journal  |  Vendor Deals  |  Member Classifieds

New IWSTI license plate promotion!Special Order IWSTI Gear featuring the Hatch!

Welcome to IWSTI.com, the largest STI specific forum on the internet, where you can interact with other STI enthusiasts, create a member journal, and receive answers to your questions. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please register today to start enjoying IWSTI membership privileges! Problem registering? Please contact support.
Go Back   IWSTI.com: Subaru STI Forums > STi Technical Discussion > Engine, Power, & Performance > Built Motor Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2008, 09:29 AM   #16
Amateur STI Driver
 
Car: 03 Black Wagon
Fav Mod: Coming Soon
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12
Join Date: Feb 2008
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: stroker engines

Just to add...Someone can correct me if I'm wrong...but doesn't an increase in displacement reduce the engines ability to spin higher rpms, which reduces the top end torque curve and power due to added engine vibration from the stroke. I understand the engine can be balanced through head work, piston balance etc..but wouldn't it make more sense to keep the current displacement and balance the engine to spin higher rpms for more top end torque rather than stroking the engine.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
gotboost_79mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 09:39 AM   #17
Junior STI Driver
 
Fav Mod: Driving School
Location: Lil'ol Rocky Ford
Posts: 85
Join Date: Dec 2006
Trader Rating: (1)
Default Re: stroker engines

Quote:
Originally Posted by gotboost_79mm View Post
Just to add...Someone can correct me if I'm wrong...but doesn't an increase in displacement reduce the engines ability to spin higher rpms, which reduces the top end torque curve and power due to added engine vibration from the stroke. I understand the engine can be balanced through head work, piston balance etc..but wouldn't it make more sense to keep the current displacement and balance the engine to spin higher rpms for more top end torque rather than stroking the engine.
Strokers are typically RPM limited due to their longer stroke. Engine A: 50mm stroke, Engine B: 100mm stroke. Assuming both turn the same RPM the pistons in engine B must have twice the average speed as the pistons in engine A. This increased speed means more force on the bearings rods, pistons etc, which can limit it's ability to rev. If you double the rate of acceleration, the force is quadrupled. So the force on the engine components goes up with the square of the RPM, making it that much harder for strokers to rev high.

Where a stroker makes sense is when low end performance and a broad torque curve are desired, such as street driving. A small displacement engine/cam package that requires screaming RPM to produce horsepower equivalent to the stroker is not what everyone is looking for from a drive ability standpoint.
There are many ways to skin a cat. The application dictates the approach that makes most sense.
MartinSTi05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 10:48 AM   #18
Grassroots STI Racer
 
Car: 06 subaru wrx sti
Fav Mod: royal purple
Location: orange, CA
Posts: 535
Join Date: Jul 2006
Trader Rating: (0)
Default Re: stroker engines

damn you guys rock. thanks for answering my question and now a get it. i was having a brain fart i forgot about the displacement part of the engine. im gonna stroke out the engine for my K5 blazer. its a 396 big block but in reality it came from chevy bored out to a 402. im taking the block to get bored out .060 more and buy a stroker kit thanks to you guys. i may also run meth in it so i can run a 10.89 comp on 91 pump. maybe in the future ill bore out the STi after the GT35r.
disturbed1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2008, 05:53 PM   #19
Support Our Sponsors
 
Fav Mod: $20. mudflaps from auto zone
Location: my cave
Posts: 5,708
Join Date: Dec 2003
Trader Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Neanderthal Racing
Default Re: stroker engines

Big Bore Or Long Stroke: Which Is Better? | National Dragster | Find Articles at BNET.com

i've got an overbore to 2.6l.


This ad is not endorsed by this member. Please register or login to hide this ad.
Neanderthal Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Designed & Powered by Domain Architect